sscarcella

My feedback

  1. 10,273 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1189 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  2. 7,063 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    602 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Performance has been and continues to be a big focus area for Teams. One main area we have made improvements in is responsiveness for the most frequent user actions of switching between Chat, Channel, and Activity. We are also focused on reducing resource consumption and application load time. More improvements are on the way.

    ~Alex

    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  3. 6,537 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  414 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  4. 7,840 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    328 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  5. 11,195 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1249 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  6. 12,270 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    994 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  7. 9,103 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    589 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  8. 24,631 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2017 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  9. 2,790 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    522 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  10. 73 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  11. 288 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    48 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    try this instead  ·  Warren responded

    Updating the status to “Try this instead” and have added the clarification that after 30 days the name is once again available.

    The reason for this decision was that Channels can be restored 30 days after being deleted. During this time, we intentionally don’t support creating a channel with the same name. After the 30 days, the name is available.

    You can workaround this by restoring a deleted channel, renaming it, and then deleting the channel again. The previous name is then available for use.

    This workaround has already been mentioned in the comments and if an immediate reuse of a Channel Name is required, this is the recommended solution.
    -Warren

    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  12. 112 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request has been declined by the feature team. However, the feature team is working on design changes to better help differentiate Teams files.
    Which hopefully will help alleviate the confusion users are experiencing when when trying to identify SharePoint files versus Teams files.

    -Warren

    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  13. 3,339 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    298 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is working its way through the backlog queue. No new details are available yet.

    -Warren

    sscarcella commented  · 

    I agree, SharePoint Team sites should be the same as Group sites. It is too confusing to have a department SharePoint site but then create a department team which creates another completely different site... You should just be able to select an existing SharePoint site to bind the Team to if one exists.

    or at least, if you could create the Team Group site within the SharePoint site but I really think they should be the same...

    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
  14. 975 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    146 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sscarcella supported this idea  · 
1 2 4 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.