TimTim

My feedback

  1. 2,879 votes
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)

      We’ll send you updates on this idea

      111 comments  ·  Public » Video and Phone Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      TimTim commented  · 

      I'm concerned that this will be confusing regardless of the implementation. Notification sync'ing between the two has potential, but conversation history? S4B has no concept of a channel, so what channel in Teams is the S4B history going to sync with? A private Teams chat with all members of the S4B chat? And visa-versa?

      Too many apps with overlap now...maybe S4B should be retired. :-)

    • 6,382 votes
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)

        We’ll send you updates on this idea

        630 comments  ·  Public » Privacy and Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

        Hi everyone, thanks for your comments in this thread, tweets, emails and calls. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to me with any questions at all; I’m here for YOU! I’ll continue to update this ticket as we make progress towards MSA.

        Just in case you missed it, there is a FAQs in the Guest Access Help Article. Just click the “FAQs” tab here: https://aka.ms/GuestAccessHelp We’re updating them this week with new questions we’ve been getting, like “Is Guest Access available for Business Essentials licenses?” (The answer is yes.)

        Lastly, the team is starting work on Federation so I’ve broken out Federation into its own UserVoice ticket. Please vote and subscribe to updates on its progress here: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/20566714

        Warmly,
        Suphatra

        TimTim commented  · 

        This is a must have. Today's teams span across company borders. It needs to be easy and seamless, no requirement for a MS account. +10K

        Slack has pretty much set the bar, so Teams needs to _at least_ meet it. The area where Teams has a chance to beat-up on Slack is for all Office 365 users/companies due to the seamless integration...BUT Teams _must have_ feature parity. :-)

        TimTim supported this idea  · 
      • 4,675 votes
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)

          We’ll send you updates on this idea

          443 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

          Hi everyone, quick update for you on this feature.

          We’ve got lots of resources on this and we’re actively working on it. This is a top priority feature.

          I haven’t gotten a firm ETA from the team but I can say this won’t hit in the next month or so. Its a complicated feature, so it will take longer than that. I’ll let you know once I get a general date from them.

          Thanks for your feedback, patience, and as always, thank you for your support of Teams.

          Sincerely,
          Suphatra

          Questions? Tweet me at @skprufo.

          TimTim supported this idea  · 
          TimTim commented  · 

          Yes, private channels are important. One use case is specific team members may be assigned to a client's project. There would be a channel built for this project but only those assigned to the project should be in the channel.

        Feedback and Knowledge Base