This is under review! If you have more ideas/feedback specifically on this item, please sign up for user testing here: https://1drv.ms/xs/s!AryUNzh1ogZzif8pDcOcx2pW45I87w
You can also tweet me at @skprufo if you have any questions.
We, when installing Teams, simply disable Skype for business and allBoris commented
Skype for business needs to be put to sleep as a sick dog and actively develops the Teams :) We could not accustom users to Skype for business for several years, the users took the Teams immediately within a couple of weeks
Hi everyone, I need some help from you on this. Can you add to the conversation thread on UserVoice —
What is more important to you, having the presence be different (i.e. reflect your machine activity and not just your Teams activity) or having it be synchronous to Skype for Business?
Why are you using Skype for Business and Teams at the same time? (I’m not being facetious, this is an actual user research question so I can understand your use case/scenario.)
Thank you for your help. The more info I have, the better I can represent your voice to engineering!
Hi everyone, I sent over your feedback to the performance team and they let me know they are actively working on this.
“Our development organization is continually working to improve product performance and has several efforts currently underway around memory usage, action responsiveness and application start time. Updates which improve performance are part of our regular update process. Thank you for your feedback regarding the performance of Microsoft Teams.”
I will check in on them in a few weeks to see if we can get exact numbers/details on what’s been improved, and I’ll let you know.
Meanwhile, have a great weekend and don’t forget to set your clocks forward by an hour for Daylight Savings!