Seth

My feedback

  1. 3,120 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    418 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth supported this idea  · 
  2. 15,712 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1870 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth supported this idea  · 
  3. 138 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    we have this!  ·  Suphatra responded

    Just hover over a person’s avator and click the org chart icon in the screen that appears. Or you can click the “Organization” tab in your 1:1 chat with them. If you want to move around your company’s org chart, just click the different people who appear in the chart.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Seth commented  · 

    Given Teams has implemented the basic org chart functionality (which is great!) it seems like a full "top down" org chart should be not only simple to provide but also a no-brainer feature.
    This NEEDS to be provided!

  4. 440 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    44 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hey everyone — Suphatra’s back! And I’m on the case with this item.

    I talked to engineering and I think they don’t understand this request. The requests says “Admin App” — do you mean Admin Center? The O365 portal?

    Also, what exactly do you envision for central administration — for example — what can you do now, can’t do, and would like to do with this new feature.

    Your feedback will help me get the team to put more resources into this. Thank you!

    Suphatra

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Seth commented  · 

    Incredible that this wasn't rolled out with the platform. Very short-sighted.

    Seth supported this idea  · 
  5. 538 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    110 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This request is still being considered by the feature team but a final decision has not yet been made. I’m still awaiting more details.

    -Warren

    Seth supported this idea  · 
  6. 17,496 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1619 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Multi-window chat is in testing. I hope to have great news regarding rollout to the public rings soon.

    We are working to ensure that multi-window and other future multi-window experiences are of the highest quality when they release.

    Thanks!

    Seth supported this idea  · 
  7. 6,047 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    569 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Seth commented  · 

    This absolutely needs to be addressed. I've brought it up in other threads here that related to the reply button.

    The 100+ employee org I maintain right now has a massive problem with accidentally creating a new convo instead of replying - heck, even i do it sometimes. Every other threaded convo system i'm aware of utilizes a "Create a new post" kind of button and that seems to be a universal standard that works very well.

    Seth supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,575 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    112 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The feature team is still considering this item. No confirmation yet.
    -Warren

    Seth supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Seth commented  · 

    Can't move my entire dev/product team over until an import function is created.
    **** - even a third party "so-so" bandaid would be good enough.

  9. 2,362 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    318 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.

    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Seth commented  · 

    I like Manny's idea below.
    This is a preference based issue and should be "fixed" so that both sides win.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Seth commented  · 

    After reading a few of the "use cases" below - it seems the folks that are requesting the merger of "Chat" and "Teams" are ones working in small groups/companies.

    For an org of our size - having these tabs combined would destroy functionality. Maybe it would be better to provide users (or admin) with the ability to pick between two "types" of views for Teams. One of these views could be better situated for those who only have a handful of people in their team.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Seth commented  · 

    We very much enjoy having the "peer to peer" chat functions (those from S4B) under a separate section.
    If the "Teams" and "Chat" tabs were to be merged together, it would be a chaotic mess!

    Allow admins to decide which style UI that works for their environment - forcing this kind of change down the pipe on us will absolutely move us away from Teams entirely.

  10. 9,602 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    384 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth supported this idea  · 
  11. 14,933 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1145 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Seth commented  · 

    A must have!

    Seth supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base