Seth

My feedback

  1. 2,006 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    326 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth supported this idea  · 
  2. 9,141 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1038 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth supported this idea  · 
  3. 97 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    we have this!  ·  Suphatra responded

    Just hover over a person’s avator and click the org chart icon in the screen that appears. Or you can click the “Organization” tab in your 1:1 chat with them. If you want to move around your company’s org chart, just click the different people who appear in the chart.

    Seth commented  · 

    Given Teams has implemented the basic org chart functionality (which is great!) it seems like a full "top down" org chart should be not only simple to provide but also a no-brainer feature.
    This NEEDS to be provided!

  4. 1,992 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    197 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    Hate to be the bearer of bad news. This item has been declined. There will be no work to hide or remove the reply button.

    As many people have commented, a big ask is to help improve how people distinguish between giving a reply and starting a new message.
    For that the focus will be on this item. “Better visual delineation between `Reply` and `Start a new conversation`”
    http://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/19224826

    Seth commented  · 

    Seeing the current "Working On It" status to minimize the "reply" button is upsetting.
    It's extremely evident that users are still using the "new conversation" field to reply and making this "reply" button even more inconspicious is going to lead to more and more people screwing up the threaded chat.

    If the reply button is going to be made smaller then it MUST be in conjunction with a change to how threaded conversations are started. Without making "Start a new conversation" a button of some sort - users will turn this threaded convo view into a giant messy chat room with no organization.

    Seth commented  · 

    This seems insane to me.
    If the reply button is made LESS pronounced then every channel will turn into a messy chat room with no organization!

    I can understand how this request might have been generated from some small 5-person crew but with an org of 100+ people like ours, a less obvious way to "reply" will destroy functionality.

    I believe there should be a button at the bottom for "Create a new post/convo" (as any threaded conversation platform has?) and the reply field can happen when you click on a convo - removing the wasted space and complaining from smaller groups.

    Seth commented  · 

    The threaded conversations work great but I'd vote that the "reply" button needs to be completely rethought.

    My users still (regardless of the multiple trainings) reply to conversations by creating their own topic because the "reply" button isn't intuitive.

    Something needs to be reworked so that the layout drives a user toward correctly replying to a conversation.
    I believe creating a button at the bottom that says "Create topic" which then allows users to enter text into the field would work much better and drive users to utilize the platform correctly.

  5. 422 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    42 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro - Controls and Knobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hey everyone — Suphatra’s back! And I’m on the case with this item.

    I talked to engineering and I think they don’t understand this request. The requests says “Admin App” — do you mean Admin Center? The O365 portal?

    Also, what exactly do you envision for central administration — for example — what can you do now, can’t do, and would like to do with this new feature.

    Your feedback will help me get the team to put more resources into this. Thank you!

    Suphatra

    Seth commented  · 

    Incredible that this wasn't rolled out with the platform. Very short-sighted.

    Seth supported this idea  · 
  6. 446 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    91 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This request is still being considered by the feature team but a final decision has not yet been made. I’m still awaiting more details.

    -Warren

    Seth supported this idea  · 
  7. 8,983 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    944 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth supported this idea  · 
  8. 3,126 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    375 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth commented  · 

    This absolutely needs to be addressed. I've brought it up in other threads here that related to the reply button.

    The 100+ employee org I maintain right now has a massive problem with accidentally creating a new convo instead of replying - heck, even i do it sometimes. Every other threaded convo system i'm aware of utilizes a "Create a new post" kind of button and that seems to be a universal standard that works very well.

    Seth supported this idea  · 
  9. 4,820 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    841 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth supported this idea  · 
    Seth commented  · 

    YES YES YES!!!!!

  10. 1,453 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    110 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The feature team is still considering this item. No confirmation yet.
    -Warren

    Seth supported this idea  · 
    Seth commented  · 

    Can't move my entire dev/product team over until an import function is created.
    **** - even a third party "so-so" bandaid would be good enough.

  11. 1,882 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    248 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.

    -Warren

    Seth commented  · 

    I like Manny's idea below.
    This is a preference based issue and should be "fixed" so that both sides win.

    Seth commented  · 

    After reading a few of the "use cases" below - it seems the folks that are requesting the merger of "Chat" and "Teams" are ones working in small groups/companies.

    For an org of our size - having these tabs combined would destroy functionality. Maybe it would be better to provide users (or admin) with the ability to pick between two "types" of views for Teams. One of these views could be better situated for those who only have a handful of people in their team.

    Seth commented  · 

    We very much enjoy having the "peer to peer" chat functions (those from S4B) under a separate section.
    If the "Teams" and "Chat" tabs were to be merged together, it would be a chaotic mess!

    Allow admins to decide which style UI that works for their environment - forcing this kind of change down the pipe on us will absolutely move us away from Teams entirely.

  12. 6,214 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  397 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth commented  · 

    I have dropped S4B and migrated comepletely over to Teams in our org (100+ employees).
    I get alot of complaints from users who want to be able to "mute" particular channels that may/may not apply to them. Currently you can only turn off notifications globally which is not effective.

    Many of our users have turned off notifications entirely because they have no way to control which channels alert them - this is killing the adoption of the platform because now no one sees anything going on.

    Seth supported this idea  · 
  13. 7,468 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    319 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth supported this idea  · 
  14. 10,925 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    954 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Seth commented  · 

    A must have!

    Seth supported this idea  · 
  15. 1,413 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    191 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The ability to remove a user from group chats (including meeting chats) is now available on desktop, and coming soon to mobile.

    How it works: A user can go to any group chat of 3 or more people and navigate to the roster and by hovering over any user you will see the “X”. Clicking on this will show a confirmation dialog. Then the user must select remove to remove the user. 

    What does everyone see: Everyone in the chat will see the control message that says “User A removed User B from the chat”. 

    What does the removed user see: The removed user will still have access to the chat history but will no longer see new messages after the point of removal and will not be able to compose messages or make any changes to the chat.

    Note: This setting is controlled by your tenant admin, so may or may not…

    Seth commented  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.