SethSeth

My feedback

  1. 1,219 votes
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)

      We’ll send you updates on this idea

      105 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      We got a flood of feedback in research not to eliminate this button completely, but to minimize it. So you’ll see a design change soon that makes the Reply button a little bit less conspicuous.

      Let me know if you have any questions!

      Suphatra

      SethSeth commented  · 

      Seeing the current "Working On It" status to minimize the "reply" button is upsetting.
      It's extremely evident that users are still using the "new conversation" field to reply and making this "reply" button even more inconspicious is going to lead to more and more people screwing up the threaded chat.

      If the reply button is going to be made smaller then it MUST be in conjunction with a change to how threaded conversations are started. Without making "Start a new conversation" a button of some sort - users will turn this threaded convo view into a giant messy chat room with no organization.

      SethSeth commented  · 

      This seems insane to me.
      If the reply button is made LESS pronounced then every channel will turn into a messy chat room with no organization!

      I can understand how this request might have been generated from some small 5-person crew but with an org of 100+ people like ours, a less obvious way to "reply" will destroy functionality.

      I believe there should be a button at the bottom for "Create a new post/convo" (as any threaded conversation platform has?) and the reply field can happen when you click on a convo - removing the wasted space and complaining from smaller groups.

      SethSeth commented  · 

      The threaded conversations work great but I'd vote that the "reply" button needs to be completely rethought.

      My users still (regardless of the multiple trainings) reply to conversations by creating their own topic because the "reply" button isn't intuitive.

      Something needs to be reworked so that the layout drives a user toward correctly replying to a conversation.
      I believe creating a button at the bottom that says "Create topic" which then allows users to enter text into the field would work much better and drive users to utilize the platform correctly.

    • 111 votes
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)

        We’ll send you updates on this idea

        12 comments  ·  Public » Admin Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        SethSeth commented  · 

        Incredible that this wasn't rolled out with the platform. Very short-sighted.

        SethSeth supported this idea  · 
      • 116 votes
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)

          We’ll send you updates on this idea

          15 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          SethSeth supported this idea  · 
        • 221 votes
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)

            We’ll send you updates on this idea

            30 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            SethSeth supported this idea  · 
          • 141 votes
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)

              We’ll send you updates on this idea

              under review  ·  15 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              SethSeth commented  · 

              This absolutely needs to be addressed. I've brought it up in other threads here that related to the reply button.

              The 100+ employee org I maintain right now has a massive problem with accidentally creating a new convo instead of replying - heck, even i do it sometimes. Every other threaded convo system i'm aware of utilizes a "Create a new post" kind of button and that seems to be a universal standard that works very well.

              SethSeth supported this idea  · 
            • 248 votes
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                I agree to the terms of service
                Signed in as (Sign out)

                We’ll send you updates on this idea

                19 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                SethSeth supported this idea  · 
                SethSeth commented  · 

                YES YES YES!!!!!

              • 651 votes
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  I agree to the terms of service
                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                  34 comments  ·  Public » Video and Phone Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  SethSeth supported this idea  · 
                • 651 votes
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    I agree to the terms of service
                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                    56 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                    Hi everyone,

                    I know this feature will make migrating to Teams much easier for so many of you - and that’s why its an important feature. We’re having trouble implementing it because it requires access to information and functionality not yet exposed (create teams, channels, write messages, “imitating” real users, etc.). So, we first are working to make this functionality available-namely, providing a “Create Teams” API, which is difficult and complicated, and thus going to take much longer than we anticipated.

                    Thus, I am interested in crowdsourcing your creative brains for alternative solutions that could work temporarily while we work on this feature. If you have any ideas or hacks you’ve done to import data from another productivity tool, please share!

                    Thanks so much, especially for your support of Teams.

                    Sincerely,
                    Suphatra

                    SethSeth supported this idea  · 
                    SethSeth commented  · 

                    Can't move my entire dev/product team over until an import function is created.
                    **** - even a third party "so-so" bandaid would be good enough.

                  • 701 votes
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      I agree to the terms of service
                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                      80 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                      Thank you for this feedback!

                      You’re right, Sam: the only difference between these two tabs are their privacy settings. They have the same function: chatting.

                      While we may not implement the solution above, we hear the feedback loud and clear and are reviewing the problem.

                      Thank you for your feedback and please continue to help us make Teams great!

                      Sincerely,
                      Suphatra
                      Microsoft Teams

                      Email: sparavi@microsoft.com
                      Twitter: @skprufo

                      SethSeth commented  · 

                      I like Manny's idea below.
                      This is a preference based issue and should be "fixed" so that both sides win.

                      SethSeth commented  · 

                      After reading a few of the "use cases" below - it seems the folks that are requesting the merger of "Chat" and "Teams" are ones working in small groups/companies.

                      For an org of our size - having these tabs combined would destroy functionality. Maybe it would be better to provide users (or admin) with the ability to pick between two "types" of views for Teams. One of these views could be better situated for those who only have a handful of people in their team.

                      SethSeth commented  · 

                      We very much enjoy having the "peer to peer" chat functions (those from S4B) under a separate section.
                      If the "Teams" and "Chat" tabs were to be merged together, it would be a chaotic mess!

                      Allow admins to decide which style UI that works for their environment - forcing this kind of change down the pipe on us will absolutely move us away from Teams entirely.

                    • 1,750 votes
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        I agree to the terms of service
                        Signed in as (Sign out)

                        We’ll send you updates on this idea

                        190 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                        This gained a lot of traction five months ago and seems to have tappered off. Now that we’ve created “Follow a channel” — do you still have a business need for this feature? If so, could you share that information in the thread here on UserVoice, under this item.

                        Thank you,
                        Suphatra

                        SethSeth commented  · 

                        I have dropped S4B and migrated comepletely over to Teams in our org (100+ employees).
                        I get alot of complaints from users who want to be able to "mute" particular channels that may/may not apply to them. Currently you can only turn off notifications globally which is not effective.

                        Many of our users have turned off notifications entirely because they have no way to control which channels alert them - this is killing the adoption of the platform because now no one sees anything going on.

                        SethSeth supported this idea  · 
                      • 2,037 votes
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          I agree to the terms of service
                          Signed in as (Sign out)

                          We’ll send you updates on this idea

                          145 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                          SethSeth supported this idea  · 
                        • 2,466 votes
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            I agree to the terms of service
                            Signed in as (Sign out)

                            We’ll send you updates on this idea

                            123 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                            So it turns out there are some several external dependencies that are hindering our plans for this feature. We are pulling it back into review so we can determine feasibility. Here’s to hoping we find a way to bring this to you — right now its very difficult. We are not taking this off the table though; we know this is an important feature, so we’re tracking the external dependencies to see where they land.

                            Thanks,
                            Suphatra

                            SethSeth commented  · 

                            A must have!

                            SethSeth supported this idea  · 
                          • 2,919 votes
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              I agree to the terms of service
                              Signed in as (Sign out)

                              We’ll send you updates on this idea

                              453 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                              SethSeth commented  · 

                              "What is more important to you, having the presence be different (i.e. reflect your machine activity and not just your Teams activity) or having it be synchronous to Skype for Business?"

                              -- If Teams based it's presence off of machine activity then by nature it would be synchronized to S4B. Teams should be capable of being the only in house chat platform in an org. Those who have both only seem to do so because of the missing features that are slowly being implemented.

                              Why are you using Skype for Business and Teams at the same time? (I’m not being facetious, this is an actual user research question so I can understand your use case/scenario.)

                              --I've migrated all users off of Skype and over to Teams. There are alot of complaints currently with screen sharing, presence settings, and some other S4B features that aren't present - however this platform is fine for our 100+ employee organization.

                              SethSeth commented  · 

                              I've successfully removed S4B from our environment and migrated all users to Teams (100+ employees)...
                              Unfortunately, they are all very frustrated with the "presence" functionality.

                              Why can't Team's presence system work the same way S4B did?
                              -Presence system is based on computer usage (not app usage)
                              -Presence system is integrated to outlook (scheduled meetings turn user to "busy" - etc)

                              I'll bet if these simple features were built into Teams - no one would complain about it.
                              You had a great system before - zero sense in changing it!

                            • 54 votes
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                I agree to the terms of service
                                Signed in as (Sign out)

                                We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                12 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                SethSeth commented  · 
                              • 1,049 votes
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  I agree to the terms of service
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                  127 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                  Hi everyone,

                                  “Leave a chat” is currently in our Ring 1 for internal testing, so you’ll see it soon once it passes our validation tests.

                                  “Must a chat” is on the backlog, so we haven’t started work on this yet.

                                  Hope you’re enjoying your July!

                                  Suphatra

                                  SethSeth commented  · 

                                  Adding a +1 on this.
                                  We've moved our entire org over from S4B to Teams and this has become a huge pain point.

                                  If someone creates a group and some users decide they don't want to be apart of it - there is no escape and they are constantly hit with notifications on something they don't want/need.

                                  I can understand this being a missed item at launch but for it to still continue being an issue is crazy. This is a MUST HAVE and needs to be correctly immediately.

                                • 2,517 votes
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    I agree to the terms of service
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                    98 comments  ·  Public » Video and Phone Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                    SethSeth commented  · 

                                    I've moved our entire org over to Teams and disable Skype across the board.
                                    There is no reason I can find for our environment (or any other environment) to need both if Teams can provide some of the core features provided by S4B.

                                    -Screensharing needs to not require a video/phone call
                                    -Presence integration into outlook is a MUST
                                    -Presence system based on device usage NOT app usage is a must

                                    If we can get those things in place - 95% of my user complaints will be solved and our environment will no longer have a use for S4B

                                    SethSeth commented  · 

                                    The desktop screenshare is an important feature of skype that my users utilized often.
                                    Forcing users to do a video conference first before being able to share their screen is a huge inconvenience. Either allow users to set a preference so that their webcam is not defaulted on during a video call or provide a way to share a screen outside of a video call.

                                    SethSeth supported this idea  · 
                                  • 5,669 votes
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      I agree to the terms of service
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                      451 comments  ·  Public » Privacy and Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                      Hey guys, I’m rallying to get you more info. In the meantime, here’s the official response from our PR team:

                                      “We are actively working on guest access. Thanks for your patience and stay tuned for more."

                                      I share in your frustration and promise we are dedicated to delivering this feature, and I promise to continue to advocate for you. I appreciate your investment in us and Teams’ success.

                                      If you have any questions, as always — just email or tweet.

                                      -Suphatra

                                      Twitter: skprufo Email: sparavimicrosoft.com

                                      SethSeth commented  · 

                                      VERY unhappy to find out that I was unable to allow my users to share files within their groups externally. I assumed this would be more of an internal tool by nature but allowing external parties in to an extent is a MUST if I have any hope of migrating our users away from Slack.

                                    • 640 votes
                                      Sign in
                                      Check!
                                      (thinking…)
                                      Reset
                                      or sign in with
                                      • facebook
                                      • google
                                        Password icon
                                        I agree to the terms of service
                                        Signed in as (Sign out)

                                        We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                        85 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                        Hi everyone, wanted to give you an update since it’s been a while.

                                        We did resolve this issue, and have this live in our internal rings — we are now starting to move it along our outer rings for more validation testing. It was having some validation issues before, which is why the fix didn’t come out sooner, but it should move much more smoothly now.

                                        I’m anticipating this will be done by the end of the month. I’ll make sure to update you once its complete. Thanks so much for your patience, and for helping us make Teams great!

                                        Sincerely,
                                        Suphatra

                                        SethSeth commented  · 

                                        This is insane.
                                        Skype for Business/Lync did it right. It showed if the user was available or away (literally).
                                        This "update" to Teams now automatically switches you away but requires manual intervention in order to be shown as available?! Whoever made this decision needs to stop providing input.

                                        SethSeth supported this idea  · 

                                      Feedback and Knowledge Base