Chris WB

My feedback

  1. 23,085 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1885 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    Chris WB commented  · 

    For perspective, when this was raised; Arya had just killed the Freys, the Great Sept was destroyed and Queen Cersei was crowned.

    A meaningful update (not just we're working on it) would be greatly appreciated

    Chris WB commented  · 

    Well that got a big response from the community! @Suphatra it would be good to know that this is still under consideration/in development and not just shelved based on a feature that will add confusion and complexity to our Teams setup.

    To put this into context for my business (consulting) firm. I will be managing customers with projects for "management", "project specific", "team member specific"

    In the current model I would need to setup teams for each of the above scope for each of my cusotmers.

    Customer - Management
    - General
    - Etc etc
    Customer - Project A
    - General
    - Etc etc
    Customer - Project B
    - General
    - Etc etc
    Customer - Project C
    - General
    - Etc etc
    Customer - Team Member 1
    - General
    - Etc etc
    Customer - Team Member 2
    - General
    - Etc etc
    Customer - Team Member 3
    - General
    - Etc etc
    Customer - Team Member 4
    - General
    - Etc etc
    Customer - Team Member 5
    - General
    - Etc etc
    Customer - Team Member 6
    - General
    - Etc etc

    If we had private channels I could instead simplify this relationship (and the structure in Teams) to;

    Customer
    - General
    - Management
    - Project A
    - Project B
    - Project C
    - Team Member 1
    - Team Member 2
    - Team Member 3
    - Team Member 4
    - Team Member 5
    - Team Member 6

    Chris

    Chris WB supported this idea  · 
  2. 10,915 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    953 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris WB supported this idea  · 
  3. 280 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  19 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris WB supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.