Andy Merskin

My feedback

  1. 137 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy Merskin supported this idea  · 
  2. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy Merskin shared this idea  · 
  3. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Andy Merskin shared this idea  · 
  4. 61 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy Merskin supported this idea  · 
  5. 386 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    73 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There are two parts to this topic:
    1) Bypass the lobby for PSTN: The ability for admins and organizers to be able to specify a meeting option to bypass the PSTN lobby independently of the VoIP lobby — This is supported in the public ring now.
    2) Admit from lobby for PSTN: Organizer having ability to admit PSTN attendees from the lobby, when the organizer has joined via PSTN with a PIN. – This is on the backlog. Please note: by choosing the meeting option to bypass the PSTN lobby, your attendees will join.

    Andy Merskin supported this idea  · 
  6. 11,789 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1012 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Great performance and user experience remain a topmost priority for us. Application launch time has seen improvements in the recent build. We will continue making improvements across the product including channel to chat switching and overall resource consumption.

    Andy Merskin supported this idea  · 
  7. 2,572 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    340 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.

    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andy Merskin commented  · 

    To everyone who disagrees with this idea on the basis that Teams and Chat serve different purposes: you're not wrong. But it's very likely you switch between those tabs very often to reach specific people, and participating in your team discussions. There are much more efficient ways to display this separation in the UI without sacrificing their distinct purposes.

    Slack and Hipchat do this extremely well. Switching between contexts is a breeze—I don't even have to think about it. In Microsoft Teams, it's a major hassle. It's wasting a lot of people's time clicking 2-3 extra times to get somewhere when it could just be 1 click every time.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andy Merskin commented  · 

    Definitely approve of this idea. In my huge company, people are only a part of a small handful of teams, so having a dedicated "Teams" tab seems like a waste. Switching between them requires twice the amount of clicks and feels frustrating every time.

    Not to mention, there's a 1-2 second latency switching between Teams and Chat that makes it feel even more cumbersome.

    Andy Merskin supported this idea  · 
  8. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andy Merskin commented  · 

    Just to clarify, you're talking about the text replacements you can setup in System Preferences > Keyboard > Text (tab), where you can setup shortcuts to expand text, right?

    Andy Merskin supported this idea  · 
  9. 4,075 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    581 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy Merskin supported this idea  · 
  10. 157 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Merged  ·  0 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy Merskin supported this idea  · 
  11. 15,668 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1533 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy Merskin supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base