Curtis

My feedback

  1. 4,534 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    584 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still in the planning stage. No new updates are available at this time.

    -Warren

    Curtis commented  · 

    For the past 2 months people have been asking for updates @Suphatra. How are we looking on this feature. It's literally useless until this is updated. I don't even want to start building wikis until I know I can search them.

    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  2. 368 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    92 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    This request has been declined by the feature team.

    Private channels may help with items such as this request once they are released. The Private channel topic is tracked at http://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/16911079

    Please note the handling of “Guest Accounts” is a separate ask and can be found at: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16911109-guest-access

    The request about “Guest Access at the Channel” level is being tracked by this request: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/31374577-guest-access-should-be-implemented-at-the-channel

    Thank you all for the feedback.
    -Warren

    Curtis supported this idea  · 
    Curtis commented  · 

    It's neither of the two options you are suggesting. This is it's own and very valid request.

    I think what people are really requesting is that just because a user is part of a team doesn't mean they should be part of every single channel in the team. There will be lots of discussions about sub sections of a project that not everyone should be included on. Also allowing user permissions per channel would help with allowing team members to drive their portion of the project more efficiently without being given permission to drive the entire team. And like other users have said adding external members to single channel in a team would be incredibly useful.

    It appears you guys have built Teams with the very definition of the word "Team" in mind, which means you must be aware that an efficient team has roles defined, and that not every role needs to know what the other role is doing in order to complete its assignment. Just because my warehouse is part of the end delivery of a project doesn't mean they need to be part of the sales strategy discussion, and if they add input or try to keep track of that portion of the project it could hinder the desired outcome. I don't want them pulling information they may have heard in another channel as a task they need to concern themselves with. I will work with them on their role in a project, while I work with sales on their role in the project. Sales and warehouse are part of the same team but shouldn't be discussing their needs with each other necessarily, they should be communicating with the Project Manager.

    The way teams is designed now, in order for me to segregate lines of communication, I need to talk to warehouse about my project in their warehouse team, and sales about my project in the sales team. Now all the discussions and data points for my project are scattered among a bunch of teams and difficult to consolidate instead of being all on the project team where they belong.

  3. 86 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    we have this!  ·  Suphatra responded

    You can integrate Microsoft Planner or Trello as a tab in any channel in Teams. Just click the little + sign in your channel’s tabs section, and choose Planner or Trello from the pop-up window.

    Curtis commented  · 

    https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16926463-need-full-capabilities-of-planner-in-teams - it's the same as this request so the one with 34 votes can kinda be ignored or brought into that other request.

    Curtis commented  · 

    Suphatra, Sorry I believe you are missing the point of that request. Now it already ties into another vastly voted one where we are requesting a far more integrated experience for planner. I.E. I should be able to look at my "PERSONAL" planner profile within teams and see what tasks are assigned to me and which plan they belong to. The planner tab is nice but we need more.

    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  4. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Curtis commented  · 

    same request as this one https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/19623523-ctrl-k but I've upvoted both because I whole heartedly agree. There needs to be a quick conversation switch button. Easily my favorite combo on slack and one I greatly miss now having moved to teams.

    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  5. 91 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » PowerBar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  6. 2,051 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    271 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.

    -Warren

    Curtis commented  · 

    How does this have weight and votes? I'm beyond confused. Chat and teams are not the same thing. Chat is a 1 to 1 or small group conversation that does not belong in any team. Think of this separation as PM function in slack. I don't understand how this has so many upvotes. PLEASE PLEASE do not combine those tabs.

  7. 5,298 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    363 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Thanks for following our suggestion to vote this up on SharePoint. It worked! SharePoint has confirmed that they have already started working on this and I’ll be getting an ETA from them after the holidays. -Suphatra

    Curtis commented  · 

    Ha this full on breaks the sharepoint side of stuff if you decide to go in and rename the folder on your own. Honestly if you could just let us pick which folder a channel was pointed at that would fix it. Just a simple URL issue when you rename the folder yourself.

    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  8. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro - Controls and Knobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Curtis shared this idea  · 
  9. 5,716 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    404 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The feature team is still reviewing, there is lots of discussion about this item and I hope to have a decision soon.

    -Warren

    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  10. 103 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  11. 2,827 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    78 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    Due to a priority shift this request has slipped to the backlog. I hate to bring bad news. I will continue to provide the feature team your feedback and votes.
    Hopefully this will move back up in the queue soon.

    -Warren

    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  12. 427 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    43 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro - Controls and Knobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hey everyone — Suphatra’s back! And I’m on the case with this item.

    I talked to engineering and I think they don’t understand this request. The requests says “Admin App” — do you mean Admin Center? The O365 portal?

    Also, what exactly do you envision for central administration — for example — what can you do now, can’t do, and would like to do with this new feature.

    Your feedback will help me get the team to put more resources into this. Thank you!

    Suphatra

    Curtis commented  · 

    This is very needed. Admins need to be able to manage global permissions centrally and have much greater control over teams in general.

    We need at minimum.

    - The ability to delete other users Posts
    - The ability to view all created teams and manage the users and permissions of those teams
    - The ability to delete/archive any team
    - The ability to manage global/default permissions
    - The ability to manage the storage for each team
    - The ability to manage the SharePoint sites created by each team (and not just through powershell)

    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  13. 683 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    158 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Curtis supported this idea  · 
    Curtis commented  · 

    Can't click links in the website tab as well. The website tab is an amazing addition and we love it. Just give it a bit more functionality and it will be the best addition ever.

  14. 9,779 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    626 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  15. 11,431 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1318 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  16. 5,774 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    100 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon. I hope to have more details in the next couple months.

    Please know the team is actively working on this feature.
    -Warren

    Curtis supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,310 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    82 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still queued up in the backlog. No additional details are available at this moment.

    -Warren

    Curtis supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base