Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 4,951 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    377 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The feature team is still reviewing, there is lots of discussion about this item and I hope to have a decision soon.

    -Warren

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 686 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    108 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro - Controls and Knobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 429 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    51 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 8,983 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    944 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Have to be able to pop out a chat like in Skype for Business. Teams is so good...can't have something that could formerly be done in Skype.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 6,509 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    569 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Performance has been and continues to be a big focus area for Teams. One main area we have made improvements in is responsiveness for the most frequent user actions of switching between Chat, Channel, and Activity. We are also focused on reducing resource consumption and application load time. More improvements are on the way.

    ~Alex

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 4,890 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    81 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon. I hope to have more details in the next couple months.

    Please know the team is actively working on this feature.
    -Warren

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 233 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  44 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Definitely need this so that our ECM taxonomy on SharePoint is not bypassed. We treat Teams files as temporary and delete after 30 days. Important documents should go to SharePoint team sites with formal taxonomy. We heavily leverage content types and metadata and this sends us back to folders - not good.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 3,175 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    289 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is working its way through the backlog queue. No new details are available yet.

    -Warren

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Agree that metadata and taxonomy must be built in.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.