Peter Selch Dahl

My feedback

  1. 112 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Selch Dahl commented  · 
    Peter Selch Dahl commented  · 

    This is something that is really needed. Two people can create the same team without the knowledge and than they suddenly finds out two teams exist with same purpose. Now they phase the challenge of merging the conversation history, files, content, etc.

    Peter Selch Dahl supported this idea  · 
  2. 911 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    107 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This request is now being reviewed by the feature team! I’ll keep you posted as to the future decision.

    -Warren

    Peter Selch Dahl supported this idea  · 
  3. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Selch Dahl commented  · 

    The lack of support might be due to the missing support in Microsoft Graph for Conditional Access, which is need for some parts of Microsoft Teams.

    https://officespdev.uservoice.com/forums/224641-feature-requests-and-feedback/suggestions/34196017-support-azure-conditional-access-for-microsoft-gra

    Peter Selch Dahl supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.