L. Günther
My feedback
-
9,627 votes
Based on your recent feedback, we have prioritized this feature and begun working on it. We’ll update as we make progress and have more details to share.
L. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
1,124 votes
Share video and audio during meetings is released on Windows. We expect deliver support on Mac this quarter. Note: Live events support for video and audio is tracked in this item – https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/38470144.
Please refer to this page for more info on this feature: https://support.office.com/article/share-system-audio-in-a-teams-meeting-dddede9f-e3d0-4330-873a-fa061a0d8e3b.
Thanks!
L. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
460 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
197 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
357 votes
The team is currently working on this. I will let you know when I have more updates.
L. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
463 votes
Work has been done by the team to add support for partial strings. They are continuing to work on improving the experience.
L. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
998 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
3,715 votes
The team is reviewing this item and discussing potential short term and long term solutions for this. Thanks.
L. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
62 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
459 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment L. Günther
commented
I understand the need, e.g. we do not use Yammer to not have just another tool on top.
I would help reduce the huge number of teams we have. But I think the channel presentation and navigation needs to be improved compared to today. -
538 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment L. Günther
commented
I understand the need, but please, Teams must stay simple!
If this is done wrong from the visualization, UI, clearness, and simplicity, it will confuse people being confronted with too many different channel types. -
1,060 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment L. Günther
commented
Is sounds interesting, but we make the whole channel topic more and more complicated. I wonder if this creates more confusion, so it needs to be visualized clearly. Anyway, I agree on the need to have cross team interaction.
-
4,226 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
271 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
290 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
7,057 votes
This feature is now on the backlog. I will update you when we have more details to share.
L. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
54 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
34 votesL. Günther
supported this idea
·
-
16,627 votes
The team continues to make progress on this. We will share more details as we have them.
An error occurred while saving the comment L. Günther
commented
We are in TAP already and would like to test this as well, Consulting, 5000 people mainly in Europe.
L. Günther
supported this idea
·
We need threads in chats to replace email traffic better.
We have repeated discussions to replace emails more with Teams which is ok when Channels are used.
Now to 1:1 chats (or few to few = group chat):
What I miss most is the additional structure by threads. If I am discussing three different topics with one person, Teams chats is not a good UX, because I always need to mention the topic like:
"... to point 1 I agree. To point 2 I disagree because ..."
This is easy on simple one-sentence-topics, but for more complicated things it does not make things easier - and whoops we are back to email. I believe, introducing threads of subjects might be helpful (assuming we get a better solution to distinguish between "Create a new conversation" and "Reply" - otherwise we end up with the same mess of people mixing up replies and new topics like we have today.