Chad

My feedback

  1. 407 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We are expanding the limit for Teams meetngs from 300 to 1,000 active participates. Similarly, we are including a view-only experience for up to 20,000 people. For more information on the Advance Comms SKU which will include this experience, please visit https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/teams-add-on-licensing/advanced-communications.

    Please see the roadmap for more details: https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/roadmap?searchterms=65952

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chad commented  · 

    this is key for enterprise, not just education. people at our company are pushing for Zoom and this 250 limit is a big factor (along with breakout rooms, handraising, etc.). 500 would be much better than 250. this is used for large organizational meetings. Live events cannot always be used because there can only be 15 of those at a time, and those do not allow the interaction that meetings do.

    Chad supported this idea  · 
  2. 286 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    38 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  3. 36 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  4. 2,810 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    225 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! The team has reviewed this request and has added it to our backlog for both Private to Standard (Public) and Standard (Public) to Private channel conversion. We will share an update as soon as it’s available.

    Chad supported this idea  · 
  5. 10,828 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    889 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    if you have an existing post that you want to show in a different channel, you can edit the message and cross-post. This will add the top-level post to the different channel, but will not include the full set of replies. We will keep this request in mind as we evolve the cross-posting feature in the future and update if the status changes.

    Details on cross posting can be found here: https://support.office.com/article/cross-post-a-channel-conversation-in-teams-9c1252a3-67ef-498e-a7c1-dd7147b3d295.

    Chad supported this idea  · 
  6. 677 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thank you for your feedback. Many customers have asked for reporting capabilities around Praise, so this will be one of our top items in the list of things we want to add to Praise in the future.

    Chad supported this idea  · 
  7. 2,038 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    235 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    Still under review by the feature team. Nothing new to report at this time.

    -Warren

    Chad supported this idea  · 
  8. 21,104 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1334 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chad commented  · 

    Good to hear something may be on the way. We might be interested in testing (15k+ employees, professional services, in california)

    Chad supported this idea  · 
  9. 8,940 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    235 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The team has delivered improvements to the New Meeting experience in Calendar such as optional attendees, richer custom recurrence UX, as well as enhanced meeting RSVPs.

    To learn more about RSVPing to meetings in the Teams Calendar, how to create a recurring meeting, and the new meeting scheduling experience including the scheduling assistant, please visit https://support.microsoft.com/office/schedule-a-meeting-in-teams-943507a9-8583-4c58-b5d2-8ec8265e04e5.

    Thanks!

    Chad supported this idea  · 
  10. 29,064 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3608 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  11. 19,676 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1740 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chad commented  · 

    Is there a blog post/article that illustrates the changes? Has the change been pushed to all tenants? Desktop apps will need to updated to reflect the change?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chad commented  · 

    Both would be good, but I'd lean to density first over compact. Also a big win that i know was mentioned related to this UI enhancement was making separate threads more clearly distinct...so threads don't blur together, and so the reply to most recent thread doesn't blur to the box for a new thread post at the bottom (where users accidentally start a new thread when they intend to reply to the last thread). Is something like this still forthcoming for the UI enhancments?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chad commented  · 

    any update on delivery of this new UI to desktop?

  12. 959 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    160 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  13. 472 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    28 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  14. 18,520 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1951 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  15. 37 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  16. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  17. 383 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    67 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chad supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base