Kirk

My feedback

  1. 480 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kirk supported this idea  · 
  2. 10,538 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    928 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kirk supported this idea  · 
  3. 3,089 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    280 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is working its way through the backlog queue. No new details are available yet.

    -Warren

    Kirk commented  · 

    For me it is Scenario A with Q1 functionality as an option for the user to select.
    Q2 = 9 we do not want a proliferation of Group sites when our business teams already have existing SharePoint sites they have been using and simply want to add Teams functionality on top of them.
    Q3 = No.

    Kirk supported this idea  · 
  4. 22,320 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1861 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    Kirk commented  · 

    I agree that there is still a need for the ability to control access to a channel to a subset of those who are in the parent team. We may wish to have a private Team but within that large team there are sub teams who collaborate in scenarios where they need to keep their activity private from the wider team. Please consider implementing this instead of simply suggesting we create multiple Teams and increase the proliferation of groups/sites within our O365 environment.

    Kirk supported this idea  · 
  5. 298 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    30 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    try this instead  ·  Mark responded

    Wiki now supports text markdown and styling from the toolbar! We are continually improving our compose experience in Wiki, look out for new improvements coming soon!

    Kirk supported this idea  · 
  6. 603 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    96 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro - Controls and Knobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still in the works. I’m waiting for additional details from the feature team and hope to be able to share something more detailed soon.

    -Warren

    Kirk supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,153 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    75 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still queued up in the backlog. No additional details are available at this moment.

    -Warren

    Kirk commented  · 

    The ability to define and provision a Team as well as channels, connectors etc. within it are a critical aspect of making this useful for team based engagements such as bids, projects and support teams. In organisations where the engagements are starting up regularly and follow the same management or methodology users shouldn't have to repeatedly do the same configuration activities before they can start working effectively. Support for template based provisioning is essential in these scenarios.

    Kirk supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.