jeffwllms

My feedback

  1. 126 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jeffwllms commented  · 

    So i just figure out. If you change the name in AAD or through the Office365 admin, you will need to log out and exit the app. Then when you log in it should be updated.

    you need to do this for mobile as well. Anyway, it seems to be working for me know.

    jeffwllms commented  · 

    yeah even if you go through AAD it doesn't seem to update in Teams. seem to be a bug

  2. 784 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    133 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The feature team is still digging into the details of this item. I don’t have an update yet, but all your feedback and votes are shared with the feature team every month.
    I’ll keep pushing this item and hope to have more details soon.
    -Warren

    jeffwllms commented  · 

    So it works from mobile decently well because the tabs open up respective apps. But its seems a little crazy that on the desktop you cant just print it from the teams tab. You have to open/edit in the application.

    Just seems Team is a great central repository style app, to then have to jump into other apps to print, just seems weird.

  3. 218 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    Great, news… this item is now actively being worked upon! I just want to clarify that the multiple accounts is moving along for mobile.
    (Desktop will have a separate timeline and will come later.)

    I will share more details as we get closer to the release of this great feature request. :)

    -Warren

    jeffwllms commented  · 

    woot

  4. 10,429 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    855 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

    jeffwllms supported this idea  · 
    jeffwllms commented  · 

    Surprised this has so little votes

    jeffwllms commented  · 

    Definitely and issue across the office 365 suite. Teams, Skype, the mobile groups app, onedrive (can't use multiple accounts on same tenant)

    jeffwllms commented  · 

    This is definitely needed and something that has plagued the office365 enviroment for a while now. I have not been able to use groups/planner/teams effectively a all because of this limitation.

  5. 4,751 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    373 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The feature team is still reviewing, there is lots of discussion about this item and I hope to have a decision soon.

    -Warren

    jeffwllms commented  · 

    Well that difficult thing here would be to not have teams turn into outlook. Outlook is a horrible application. But it would be usefull to be able to send out an email quickly from teams. Sometimes part of a conversation in teams results in wanting to send out an email. I dislike outlook so much the idea of having to open it just to send and email out (which is a form of collaboration) kind of stinks. But at the same time don't turn this into an email app. It is already easy enough to get emails into teams. Just send the email from outlook to one note. You have access to your one note notebook in teams. Don't need to politer teams with an email inbox just to shared some individual emails.

  6. 22,424 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1863 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    jeffwllms commented  · 

    Really hope this come. Having a bunch of teams with just a general channel is annoying. Setting this up now the way we want it knowing this is in the works. So far we actually have found it isn't so important for teams to not be able to see the project groups they are not specifically on. We actually just received benefit from the fact someone who wasn't assigned to a project checked the channel out and was able to help.

    We still need it for the board groups. Because some board committee are private from the entire board. (Governing committee for example). But actually finding this feature is less important than we originally thought.

    jeffwllms supported this idea  · 
    jeffwllms commented  · 

    I think I have a somewhat different idea. Just do away with the team/channel thing all together. Have groups map directly to channel. You then have a 1 to 1 relationship with group data (another big issue) and you are able to add channels with specific groups. You reduce ui clutter since you don't have the concept of teams and channels.

    This also maps more closely to what you see in slack and other system. I think you were trying to create additional functionality by offering the additional level, but it jest seem like it is the root to all the extra confusion and complexity.

  7. 476 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    54 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    thank you!  ·  Warren responded

    Thanks for the feedback.

    We are considering a number of ways to better integrate experiences across Teams, Outlook, and other apps. However, we don’t have any specifics to share on this request.

    -Warren

    jeffwllms commented  · 

    Agreed this is pretty horrible. They added groups to outlook, I would like o get people to move to teams. but hey are still going to use outlook. No to mention he group files, notebook, and calendar. These things should have all pulled into teams.

    They just doubled up on he functionality and the whole thing became more confusing to implement and use.

    jeffwllms commented  · 

    Yep he group conversation should (or at least have he option to be pulled into a specific channel in teams. FYI the files /notes.calendar from the group is also not available from within teams. This is pretty weird. I am preferring Teams interface over groups. so I would like to migrate it. But you cant stop the group from showing up in Outlook (and everywhere else). the integration should be tighter because now it is just confusing where people should have a conversation.

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.