Michael

My feedback

  1. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  2. 103 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  3. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Microsoft Teams free  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  5. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  6. 6,538 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    192 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  7. 436 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    70 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Great news! We just started working on this for the AUDIO portion. We are still trying to determine feasibility for the video portion of your request.

    -Suphatra

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  8. 8,514 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    749 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    if you have an existing post that you want to show in a different channel, you can edit the message and cross-post. This will add the top-level post to the different channel, but will not include the full set of replies. We will keep this request in mind as we evolve the cross-posting feature in the future and update if the status changes.

    Details on cross posting can be found here: https://support.office.com/article/cross-post-a-channel-conversation-in-teams-9c1252a3-67ef-498e-a7c1-dd7147b3d295.

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  9. 2,535 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    336 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.

    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael commented  · 

    and even with the mobile app, it could be a swipe thing to move between the chat and teams view, which would be more intuitive and less taping/loading

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael commented  · 

    Maybe there can be something like having Chats next to teams.

    First, move the navigation bar to the top with only Activity, Meeting, Files and the ... displayed

    Second, make the Teams view the default view -> once you click on Activity, it overlays the Teams view; you can close it, by hit an x in the upper right or by clicking Activity again (same with Meeting and any other Button)

    Third, use the available space on the left side to place the chats there (you could win some space, by placing the Teams pics somewhere else. Or the chats sidebar could be a hover-over thing. You only see the Pics, or initials of the people, but with mouse-over it overlays the teams view and you get the full view for chats.

    As I understand it, teams is primarily for collaboration, so with this idea, the Team view stays in focus, but as others mention here, chats is as important as the teams view. So you always have both views at your finger tips, without even clicking anything

    There might be more ideas around that, but I don't think, merging Teams and Chat in one would help. As for us, it would be confusing as you need to scroll a lot

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  10. 4,167 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on the backlog  ·  281 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  11. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael commented  · 

    PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE. Also for the Team Chat.
    This messes up my ODB and the Sharepoint folders

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  12. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  13. 186 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  14. 15,600 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1756 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your continued feedback. As many people have pointed out, this is available on mobile today. Support for replying to a specific message is on the backlog for desktop. I’ll let you know when we have progress to share. Thanks.

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  15. 179 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  16. 2,271 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    84 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still under review by the feature team. I have no details as to when a decision might happen.

    -Warren

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  17. 8,344 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    443 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  18. 148 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still being reviewed by the feature team. No ETA for a decision yet.

    -Warren

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  19. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael commented  · 

    How about the following Idea:

    Instead of having private Channels, you add a level above the teams -> So the structure would look like the following:

    - Teams
    - Groups (which is now a Team) (to call it groups, makes it consistence to the name Office 365 Groups)
    - Channels

    This way you add your whole Team/Department to a "Team". There, they have the choice to join public "Groups" or can ask to be part of private "Groups".
    So you have all people organised and all the office groups sorted by department.
    Furthermore it'd be awesome to have hide groups, that are only accessible through invitation.

    Also, a group can be part of different teams. So if a group is more like a Project you can add it to the "marketing/creative" "Team" and the "Events" "Team" i.e.

    What do you think?

    (the idea came, because MS seems to have technical trouble to bring out private channels)

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  20. 10,700 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    405 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael commented  · 

    A lot of the comments read: ... part of the channel...

    There is no: I am part of that or this channel (and that is the problem)

    Everyone who is part of the group/team is potentially part of of every channel of that team. Because channels are open and the only thing you can do is favourite them.

    Right now:
    Office 365 = house
    Team/Group = room
    channel = group of people inside of that room
    -> once you are inside of the room, you can go to every group and talk with them, even listen what they talk about, without being invited to participate

    How it should be:
    Office 365 = City
    Team/Group = House
    channel = room
    -> once someone invited me into the house, I can walk around, see open doors/rooms, closed doors/rooms and there are even hidden rooms in the basement, I don't even know whether they exist

    so...

    please have open channels, private channels and hidden channels and allow us to only invite people to specific channels, without them seeing the whole house (group/team)

    then it makes sense to talk about: seeing people are part of that channel

    (probably a lot of us come from using Slack, so when they talk about channels, you need so understand how channels work in slack)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael commented  · 

    The question is, how channels will be handled in the future.

    If channels are teams (channel) inside of teams (Office Group), it'd be great to have an indicator who is part of this channel an right now active.
    (i.e. channels can be private for themselves so only invited team members can access and not everyone who is part of the office 365 group; also I can invite guests to only one channel, without letting them see the whole group with all the other channels -> that's the behaviour, i'd prefer)

    If, on the other hand, channels stay just open rooms for anyone able to access, the only need for a member indicator would be: Show me who is/was active inside of this channel (i.e. who posted something, or replied, who got mentioned, who, right now, is viewing the channel ...)

    Michael supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base