Jason W

My feedback

  1. 70 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  2. 85 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Public » Developer Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  3. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  4. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  5. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Public » Developer Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  6. 370 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jason W commented  · 

    O365 Global Admins should be able to approve potential apps & connectors. Right now the permission setting is either all open or everything closed, with no ability for admins to have a pre-approved list of apps & connectors that Team owners/members can use while restricting access to apps & connectors that the business doesn't want used.

    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  7. 471 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    44 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  8. 803 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    169 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    As mentioned in the prior status, the channel limit was raised from 100 to 200.

    In the near future a retention limit will be set so you can still go back and reinstate a channel you had deleted. Once the retention period has expired then the channel will get a hard delete which will free up the space and no longer count toward the 200 channel limit.

    This will help with some of the issues you have voiced in the comments below.
    But I understand many of you wish the limit to be further increased. I will continue to provide your votes and comments to the feature team.

    -Warren

    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  9. 635 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    63 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your continued feedback. The feature team is currently reviewing this ask and investigating how best to accomplish this. Please continue to provide your comments and votes. We will post an update as soon as one is available.

    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  10. 381 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    53 comments  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  11. 467 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    39 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  12. 281 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  47 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  13. 469 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This request is still working its way through the backlog. Nothing additional to report yet.
    -Warren

    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  14. 469 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    47 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hey everyone — Suphatra’s back! And I’m on the case with this item.

    I talked to engineering and I think they don’t understand this request. The requests says “Admin App” — do you mean Admin Center? The O365 portal?

    Also, what exactly do you envision for central administration — for example — what can you do now, can’t do, and would like to do with this new feature.

    Your feedback will help me get the team to put more resources into this. Thank you!

    Suphatra

    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  15. 1,262 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on the backlog  ·  82 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  16. 643 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on the backlog  ·  24 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  17. 4,901 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    389 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  18. 120 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  19. 97 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason W supported this idea  · 
  20. 17,375 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1517 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Great performance and user experience remain a topmost priority for us. Application launch time has seen improvements in the recent build. We will continue making improvements across the product including channel to chat switching and overall resource consumption.

    Jason W supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base