Anonymous
My feedback
-
85 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
5 votes
Thanks for the feedback. My name is Amir and I am a product manager in the Shifts team. Can you please explain a bit more about this scenario? I am trying to understand what is applicable for the Shifts app vs. general group/1:1/channel chat. Thank you!
You are receiving this email because you agreed to be contacted by Microsoft about your product feedback
Privacy Statement
Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052 USAAn error occurred while saving the comment -
917 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This is a showstopper. It's not at all clear when you set up shfits that anyone that is "allowed to schedule" a shift has to become a team owner. This is a HUGE roadblock that is keeping us from moving from Staffhub.
IF it's not fixed soon we're going to have to move from Staffhub to a third party competitive product rather than to Shifts.
This needs to be fixed, Microsoft.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
799 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
19,651 votes
We are working on a design with more density in mind. Until this design is solidified we are putting this item back to Under Review.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
89 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
29,009 votes
This continues to be on our backlog due to prioritization of other work items. We will update when there is more to share.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
18,164 votes
This item remains on the backlog.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
379 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
34 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
90 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
155 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Disclosing the reason might also contravene privacy laws in many provinces in Canada.
There are privacy implications here that Microsoft is not recognizing or respecting.Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,535 votes
This is currently in internal testing rings at Microsoft, and the feature team is targeting a release to the public in early Q2.
Stay tuned!
~Alex & the Teams team
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,725 votes
Thank you for your continued feedback. We are currently working on this, and recently announced this feature for developers in Beta. For more information, please visit https://developer.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/blogs/importing-3rd-party-platform-messages-to-microsoft-teams-is-now-available-in-beta/.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
11,567 votes
We are now preparing for the roll out of Tasks in Teams which will integrate additional features integrating To-Do and Planner. This includes additional list views that also extend to tabs in teams. Further announcements about additional integration in our overall Tasks coherence effort will follow.
You can follow the rollout via our Roadmap item: https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/roadmap?searchterms=57213. To see a preview of the experience, please visit https://youtu.be/rTATVGroEsQ.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
21,081 votes
Group Calendar is a priority for the team, and the feature team is continuing work on it. You’ll start to see some incremental improvements. We look forward to sharing more details and timeframes soon.
Thanks!
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
Ok, we have similar use case.
Every shift might be assigned a “head nurse” role or a “team leader” role. One might want to tag the team leader or ‘head nurse’ even though they don’t know which individual is covering that role.
Retail has the concept of an MOD (manager on duty) that is typically the manager in charge for a shift.
Hospitals and clinics have similar roles.
Now this would be a LOT easier if ***** allowed us to assign the ROLES first (including an alias, for example) and THEN assign people to the role.
If you’re wondering how that would work then check out competitive products like wheniwork or deputy.