Anonymous
My feedback
-
545 votes84 comments · Public » Apps, Connectors, Messaging Extensions · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
92 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thanks for the feedback. My name is Amir and I am a product manager in the Shifts team. Can you please explain a bit more about this scenario? I am trying to understand what is applicable for the Shifts app vs. general group/1:1/channel chat. Thank you!
You are receiving this email because you agreed to be contacted by Microsoft about your product feedback
Privacy Statement
Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052 USAAn error occurred while saving the comment -
1,031 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This is a showstopper. It's not at all clear when you set up shfits that anyone that is "allowed to schedule" a shift has to become a team owner. This is a HUGE roadblock that is keeping us from moving from Staffhub.
IF it's not fixed soon we're going to have to move from Staffhub to a third party competitive product rather than to Shifts.
This needs to be fixed, Microsoft.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
919 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
20,888 votes
Thank you for your feedback. The team is currently planning for this work, we will share an update as soon as one is available.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
106 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
32,128 votes
This continues to be on our backlog due to prioritization of other work items. We will update when there is more to share.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
19,658 votes
This item remains on the backlog.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
436 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
94 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
169 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Disclosing the reason might also contravene privacy laws in many provinces in Canada.
There are privacy implications here that Microsoft is not recognizing or respecting.Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,652 votes
This is currently in internal testing rings at Microsoft, and the feature team is targeting a release to the public in early Q2.
Stay tuned!
~Alex & the Teams team
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,746 votes
Thank you for your continued feedback. We are currently working on this, and recently announced this feature for developers in Beta. For more information, please visit https://developer.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/blogs/importing-3rd-party-platform-messages-to-microsoft-teams-is-now-available-in-beta/.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
12,462 votes
We are now preparing for the roll out of Tasks in Teams which will integrate additional features integrating To-Do and Planner. This includes additional list views that also extend to tabs in teams. Further announcements about additional integration in our overall Tasks coherence effort will follow.
You can follow the rollout via our Roadmap item: https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/roadmap?searchterms=57213. To see a preview of the experience, please visit https://youtu.be/rTATVGroEsQ.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
Ok, we have similar use case.
Every shift might be assigned a “head nurse” role or a “team leader” role. One might want to tag the team leader or ‘head nurse’ even though they don’t know which individual is covering that role.
Retail has the concept of an MOD (manager on duty) that is typically the manager in charge for a shift.
Hospitals and clinics have similar roles.
Now this would be a LOT easier if ***** allowed us to assign the ROLES first (including an alias, for example) and THEN assign people to the role.
If you’re wondering how that would work then check out competitive products like wheniwork or deputy.