David McKnight

My feedback

  1. 214 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    28 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight commented  · 

    Having to change tenants to use the features of Teams is the primary reason we have been slow to deploy to our clients. They are not going to think to switch to our tenant to check to see if there is anything worth looking at -- they need to be proactively notified to look (and the little number above the tenant switch is not it). They need to get a banner that says a message has come in, or an @mention is there -- or there is other activity in a channel they are following. Without this, the collaboration promise falls way short.

  2. 117 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight commented  · 

    Having to change tenants to use the features of Teams is the primary reason we have been slow to deploy to our clients. They are not going to think to switch to our tenant to check to see if there is anything worth looking at -- they need to be proactively notified to look (and the little number above the tenant switch is not it). They need to get a banner that says a message has come in, or an @mention is there -- or there is other activity in a channel they are following. Without this, the collaboration promise falls way short.

  3. 46 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight commented  · 

    Having to change tenants to use the features of Teams is the primary reason we have been slow to deploy to our clients. They are not going to think to switch to our tenant to check to see if there is anything worth looking at -- they need to be proactively notified to look (and the little number above the tenant switch is not it). They need to get a banner that says a message has come in, or an @mention is there -- or there is other activity in a channel they are following. Without this, the collaboration promise falls way short.

  4. 46 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight commented  · 

    Having to change tenants to use the features of Teams is the primary reason we have been slow to deploy to our clients. They are not going to think to switch to our tenant to check to see if there is anything worth looking at -- they need to be proactively notified to look (and the little number above the tenant switch is not it). They need to get a banner that says a message has come in, or an @mention is there -- or there is other activity in a channel they are following. Without this, the collaboration promise falls way short.

  5. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight commented  · 

    Having to change tenants to use the features of Teams is the primary reason we have been slow to deploy to our clients. They are not going to think to switch to our tenant to check to see if there is anything worth looking at -- they need to be proactively notified to look (and the little number above the tenant switch is not it). They need to get a banner that says a message has come in, or an @mention is there -- or there is other activity in a channel they are following. Without this, the collaboration promise falls way short.

  6. 710 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    75 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still being reviewed by the feature team.

    -Warren

    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  7. 876 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    48 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
    David McKnight commented  · 

    I need federation with government clients. They see us using Teams, and can't understand why we can't collaborate with it. It's on the roadmap for GCC -- the sooner the better! Thx.

  8. 1,117 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    87 comments  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
    David McKnight commented  · 

    I can sync files, but you have to do it through Office 365 Groups.

  9. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight shared this idea  · 
  10. 258 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    49 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    Great news! This feature request is being worked upon by the Planner team!
    Expect an update soon.

    -Warren

    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  11. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  12. 512 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    84 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight commented  · 

    I want the ability to set a policy based on the membership of the team. If they are existing external members of a specified team, I want to be able to allow them to join immediately without having to admit them from the lobby.

    If they are members of the public or other clients, I want to be able to admit them one by one from the lobby. That way I can control who has access to a specific meeting.

    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  13. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  14. 100 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  15. 61 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  16. 69 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  17. 10,779 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1213 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  18. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
  19. 96 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight commented  · 

    Cross functional indexing came up in the Teams Tuesday meeting today. Being able to search for content between OneNote and the Wiki tab. I added the following...

    Seth and Christopher, indexing content is a big deal. For instance, I'd like to search for a card we're using in the planner. The ideal way to do this is to simply enter a name or support ticket number in the search bar, but that doesn't work with the planner.

    So here is the funky work-around we are currently using:

    1) EVERY time a new card is created be sure searchable meta data (support ticket number, client name, person's name) is included in the name of the card,

    2) copy a link to the card,

    3) go to the Conversation tab, and paste the link. We have just self-indexed the planner card. Now when we want to find the card we

    4) enter the person's name or support ticket number into the search bar, and it locates the linked conversation,

    5) we click on the found conversation, and it opens in the conversation tab, where we now see the link to the related planner card and we

    6) click on the link, which then generally opens the link in the browser, and asks us if we want to open it in the Teams web app or desktop app. We

    7) click on the desktop app and

    8) the appropriate card opens...

    It would be SO MUCH NICER to be able to have the planner card indexed and searchable. BUT at least we figured out a way to do it while we're waiting.

  20. 486 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David McKnight supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.