Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 1,938 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    143 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Public » Account Access (Sign-In)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 26,939 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2218 comments  ·  Public » Account Access (Sign-In)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The ability to use multiple Teams accounts at the same time is supported on iOS & Android today. The feature team is continuing to work on support for multiple accounts on desktop. We’ll keep you posted as we have more details.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Nope. For the sake of security, mobile device management, this should be enabled via the ability to have multiple clients open. Multiple identities in the same app instance just invites problems.

  6. 2,863 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    395 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Also respectfully disagree.

    Chat and Teams are two different things. One is completely private, and the other is either completely public, or at least public to the team.
    If it is even remotely possible that anyone will ever say something in a team that was meant for a chat there is no way I'd want to take the chance.
    If you don't believe me, try "mentioning" something in a loud voice that to blow off steam in your next exec-level meeting. See how well that works, since "teams" and "chats" are the same thing.
    Not to mention what might be a plethora of compliance issues, becuase group chats are the ONLY thing that is really private in teams, and there also may be a discovery protection against "private" converstations in chats (okay, maybe...)

    Having not used Hipchat and not used Slack is a good thing here, becuase I can see how different and in my opinion, badly, things could be designed.

  7. 2,095 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    83 comments  ·  Public » PowerBar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I think you'll find bots to be more powerful, after an initial adjustment period.

Feedback and Knowledge Base