ed hansberry

My feedback

  1. 24,695 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2025 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    ed hansberry commented  · 

    @mike - how did you get private channels? less than 2 weeks ago MS said "later this year." Seems odd it would start rolling out in April, but I'll be thrilled if it is.

    ed hansberry commented  · 

    Done! I sincerely hope private channels bear no resemblance to what was proposed in that survey. Unless I misread it about 10 times, the only thing private is the chat. Everything else is accessable via Sharepoint or other sites (planner, etc)

    ed hansberry commented  · 

    So, is one of these five suitable for this scenario? We want a team for our purchasing department (all internal) and each channel is a vendor. We would invite the vendors to a particular channel. Insiders should see it all, external are totally sandboxed, cannot even see other channels (vendors).

    ed hansberry commented  · 

    Thanks for the update. I was hoping this was forthcoming with allowing access to outsiders. That is what we are really looking for here. So we could have a "Purchasing" team with a different channel for each vendor, and those outside vendors could be invited to the Team (with the outsider access feature being worked on) but restricted to just their channel. It just isn't feasible for us to create dozens of teams to make this work.

    ed hansberry commented  · 

    Allow us to put security at the channel level within Teams, so some info could be kept confidential by team members without having to create additional teams.

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,158 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    90 comments  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,087 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    102 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still working its way through the backlog queue.

    -Warren

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  5. 3,476 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    404 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry commented  · 

    Voted! Still needs a checkbox next to that "New Conversation" button saying "I agree I understand that I am creating a new conversation"

    ANd then they should have to wait for a 6 digit code to be sent to their phone and entered into Teams before they can start a new conversation.

    And a CAPTCHA for good measure. The annoying one with street signs.

    ed hansberry commented  · 

    So 2 more months of disconnected replies? :-(

    Glad it is getting fixed, but so so so long.....

    ed hansberry commented  · 

    Thanks. This one still bites us several times a week. Maybe just get rid of the "start new conversation" box and make it a button that has to be pressed to start a new conversation. Just leave the boxes for replies.

    The sooner the better. Too much stuff is being missed because someone replies as an orphaned conversation.

    ed hansberry commented  · 

    Please please please do this. Hide the "new conversation" box! Make it so you have to click something to show it or something. It is horrible the way it is now. Especially if when scrolling the message you want to reply to has its reply box obscured by the New Conversation box.

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry shared this idea  · 
  7. 972 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    165 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The feature team is still digging into the details of this item. I don’t have an update yet, but all your feedback and votes are shared with the feature team every month.
    I’ll keep pushing this item and hope to have more details soon.
    -Warren

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  8. 4,421 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    147 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Sorry for the delay on an update on this one! I’m hunting down the status for you and will update once I have it.

    Also, if you are interested in participating in testing or surveys for this, just tweet me at @skprufo.

    Suphatra

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  9. 5,352 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    89 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon. I hope to have more details in the next couple months.

    Please know the team is actively working on this feature.
    -Warren

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  10. 6,549 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  414 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  11. 12,301 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    998 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  12. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry commented  · 

    Agreed. And to add to this. we have some files with conversations hundreds of messages long. It takes FOREVER to scroll up to get to the file. There needs to be a fast way to get to the file in these long conversations, so maybe this pagination idea is the way.

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  13. 2,817 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    226 comments  ·  Public » Emojis and GIFs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  14. 5,244 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    735 comments  ·  Public » Emojis and GIFs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  15. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry commented  · 

    Same. Getting this on my desktop (windows 10) app. Not in the browser though.

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  16. 1,309 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    107 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    I’m switching the status to Partially Done.

    The request for a Preview Team is still in the works. No new information is available at this time.

    Team Discoverability is still being worked upon, no details are available at this time. If you support this idea please navigate over to the main topic and vote for it! https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/

    Change Prompt: this has been completed
    -Warren

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  17. 388 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This request is still working its way through the backlog. Nothing additional to report yet.
    -Warren

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
  18. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry commented  · 

    To clarify how it breaks, if you unsave an item from the bottom of the list it works fine. if you unsave from the middle or top, everything below it gets off one row. It is like it remembers the count of items. So if you unsave item #6 by clicking on the bookmark in the conversation side, it removed the bookmark, but it does not remove it from the left side list.

    When i click on item #7 in that list, it shows me the body of item number 8, and 8 shows 9.

    Unsaving from the list vs the conversation view doesn't help. Same problem.

    I also noticed that the avatar from the item below moves up, so the avatar knows the item above was removed, but teams doesn't remove the snippet of the conversation.

    I can repro this on the web version in Chrome too.

    ed hansberry shared this idea  · 
  19. 449 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    77 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    Unfortunately we hit some snags and this has moved back to “working on it”. The team is working to make some corrections and I hope to have a release date in the near future. I’ll keep you posted with what I hear.
    -Warren

    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
    ed hansberry commented  · 

    Is this done, or was it killed? According to https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/skywriter/2018/04/19/office-365-planned-service-changes-april-2018-updates/ this was moved to an archive, but if it is available, I am unaware.

  20. 188 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  36 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ed hansberry supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.