John White

My feedback

  1. 12,196 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    987 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

    John White supported this idea  · 
  2. 52 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John White supported this idea  · 
  3. 93 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    John White commented  · 

    Thanks Warren - although to be clear - that's not a solution - it simply avoids the issue. In our case, the >20,000 items in a library is a necessary business requirement, and we can't bring it under.

    John White supported this idea  · 
  4. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  12 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John White supported this idea  · 
  5. 985 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    270 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hi everyone, thanks so much for this request.

    We have thought this through and decided to prioritize other user-requested items, so this one has been declined. But please don’t stop telling us what you want, because we’re still working to get many of those done. We’re listening and appreciate your support and patience.

    Suphatra

    John White supported this idea  · 
  6. 168 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  Warren responded

    The feature team has declined this request due to the fact that a similar experience already exists.

    You can achieve very similar functionality with the existing integration. The OneNote integration has been redesigned so that you can add an entire notebook as a channel tab, but always show a particular section (be it new or existing). Within each tab, you can also create other sections as well as pages within any section to better organize your notes.

    Thank you for your feedback and suggestions.
    -Warren

    John White supported this idea  · 
    John White commented  · 

    At the moment, creating a channel in the Team results in the creation of a Folder in the underlying Group Document library with the name of the channel. This is good. However, it also creates a section in the OneNote notebook with the channel name appended by _Notes. This is suboptimal - whay can't the Section name be the same as the channel name? Renaming it in OneNote also causes the connection to break. Can we get better control around artifact naming?

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.