Justin King

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King shared this idea  · 
  2. 14,469 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1160 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    As stated in the last update, the ability to use multiple Teams accounts at the same time is being implemented in stages for Desktop. Faster tenant switching functionality on the Windows client has been rolled out to the public ring fully, and Mac will begin rolling out soon. Work is in progress on cross-tenant notification improvements, and support for multiple accounts on desktop will follow. We’ll keep you posted!

    Note: The ability to use multiple Teams accounts at the same time is supported on iOS & Android today.

    Thanks,
    Alex & the Teams team

    Edited

    Justin King commented  · 

    First off kudos on the improved user switching .... it's really REALLY fast now which is nice.However we are in a race against time now ...

    ... with the release of F1 licensing for O365, a LOT of my clients are opting to buy this cheap license for contractors meaning my # of accounts has exploded. I'd love to push back and tell them to simply make me a guest instead but the reality is:

    1. The chat feature is bound to the org which makes it extremely difficult to keep up with multi-org conversations (unlike the skype of old which had no issues)
    2. Guests cannot be made owners of teams nor given other certain permissions making them inherently more limited than a dedicated account, so they aren't inclined to make me a guest anyway.

    Basically Teams limitations combined with new F1 pricing of O365 is practically forcing me to need multi-account support asap.

    I think the guest idea in Teams has a lot of potential, but Teams itself needs to work out a couple of kinks for it to work. Mainly:

    1. Chat should NOT be org-bound. You should always be logged in with your primary account and peopel trying to chat with you directly should always be able to ... just like traditional chat apps.

    2. Guest accounts need to be first class citizens. If a org decides that a contractor will make the best PM and thus wants them to be the owner of the Team ... let the org make that assignment.

    If you do this ... multi-account support won't actually be that big of a deal ... at all. Still do it, mind you, but I think you're on the verge of providing something better.

    Justin King commented  · 

    Also, if I'm being added as a guest .... aka I'm techncially only using 1 account .... why do I have to tenant switch to get chat messages? ALA Skype I should _always_ get them regardless of what tenant I'm currently visiting.

    Justin King commented  · 

    two years and counting here ... please @microsoft lets be certain we aren't over-engineering this.

    For others, lets talk options:

    Best I've found are incognito browser windows for other logins. This way you have multiple logins at once (one using the app, another using your browser), but even that gets a little tough once you hit 3+ because your auth token gets shared in icognito tabs as long as they are open... so that leaves 3 account max:

    1. team app.
    2. browser app.
    3. browser in icognito.

    Now you can add browsers to scale out further (chrome, edge beta, IE, firefox) ... but it becomes unwieldy quickly.

    Justin King commented  · 

    Year is quickly coming to an end .... status?

    Justin King commented  · 

    and to drive it home: fast tenant switching is not the ask. At all. Not one of the consolidated complaints is saying "i want to logout faster". We want to either:

    1. login everywhere at once, bypassing the speed problem
    2. have one login receive all information so multiple accounts aren't necessary.

    Ether of those work. Faster logout/login is not the ask.

    Justin King commented  · 

    Adding fuel to the fire:

    The multi-org support in Teams is fundamentally broken. If my primary account is added as a guest into a new org, I have to _switch_ orgs to talk to anyone. This is in stark contrast to simply talking freely in a B2B scenario under skype. While I completely understand org switching is needed as you attach to different SharePoint backends when navigating the actual teams ... ad-hoc chats do not need this. They simply need to be able to .. well ... chat.

    I attached a sample image where I have chats going on in three orgs and my only option is to _constantly_ change orgs to even see what is being said.

    Chat should be global. Never need switching. Only switch Teams/Files section of the client.

    Justin King commented  · 

    These seem like multiple fundamentally different ideas and as such it may take years before everyone sees what they want. Id suggest NOT merging these into one ask. The largest ask is one of multiple accounts. The key issue here is the _client_. The ask is simple: just let us log into multiple accounts at once, just at you can with Outlook. Build a collapsing tree view on the right so we can easily browse across accounts. No integration, no cross tenant work, no shared channels. Just let me open multiple accounts in the client.Other options that involve possible complex backbend tenant work is nice to have, and speeding logout is cool I guess... But really they miss the ask:. Log into multiple accounts in one client.

    Justin King commented  · 

    The guest/federation option in Teams is a complete failure from understanding customer needs to it's execution (even if e wanted it, it was done poorly).

    All that is needed is effectively a duplication of what already exists in mail systems like Outlook or other chat systesm like Slack.

    1. buisness creates an account for you (or uses an invite wizard that does this)
    2. you add account to your client
    3. you effectively see messages/mail from all logged in clients.

    Instead, what we got is a complicated guest/federation system that is riddled with "landmines" that keep proper account use from even occuring:

    1. Customer uses invite system to add a user.
    2. If IT setup an account for this user, he has to be careful NOT to select this user otherwise the wong acocunt will be invited to the chanel.
    3. If IT setup a mailbox and tried ot be nice and setup a forwarding rule to the invited person ... that person might still get an invite email ... that will not work.
    4. But if IT setup a contact, or someone else did this setup before so said user already exists as a guest in AzureAD ... then it's OK to select that user. Good luck knowing when.
    5. Then the guys accepting the invite needs to be careful. Becuase if he ever created both a Microsoft Account and has a federated account with the same email address ... then he risks opening the link under the wrong account and never being able to use Teams as you can only log into 1 at a time ... meaning full logout log in to change orgs.
    6. All the above needs to be done just so that we can have .... an accelerated logout/login process with the client that doens't even amke it possilbe to see messages from mulitple orgs.

    It's just an awful experience. All you needed to do was allow teams to log-into multiple accounts at once and make a light-weight user-creation process for teams (like slack does) and all of the above hoop jumping would be resolved.

    PLEASE: reconsider if guest account/federation is even really nessisary for teams. All the user base wants is a simple multi-account login. Outlook does this perfectly, so we know you guys can pull it off.

    Justin King supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King shared this idea  · 
  4. 12,863 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1310 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    As we announced at Microsoft Ignite 2019 this morning, we are excited to confirm that Multi-window capabilities are coming to Microsoft Teams, and will start rolling out to the public ring early next year!

    Thanks,
    Alex & the Teams team

    Justin King commented  · 

    Multi-Window will be useless if I still have to "switch tenants" every time I want to talk to someone in a different company. Please make sure chat is made global or this will be a solution that ultimately doesn't actually fix anything.

    Justin King commented  · 

    for additional clarity: chats should be universal, not org specific. If Im invited to another org and switch over to look at the various teams I should _still_ get chat messages, and not have to "switch back" to answer a quick message.

  5. 12,156 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1341 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King commented  · 

    "planning"? How much planning is needed when reducing the space between columns?

    Justin King supported this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Justin King shared this idea  · 
  7. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King commented  · 

    This is not getting nearly enough up-votes, Im guessing because most are hoping multiple login support will fix the issue for them.

    The bottom line is if you are invited as a guest to multiple organizations, chatting becomes a nightmare. In older skype like chat systems, the user could simply chat with you as long as they were federated. Under Teams, I can only chat with somone when I change into the context of their organization. Otherwise I get garbage like this attached imag.

    Having to constantly switch orgs is ridiculous and pointless. I can see it for the literal teams (you're switching into their share-point backend) but for simple, ad-hoc communication it completely fails.

    Justin King supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King shared this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King shared this idea  · 
  10. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King supported this idea  · 
  11. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King shared this idea  · 
  12. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King supported this idea  · 
  13. 10,232 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    657 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King commented  · 

    In an Agile development workflow this is a critical feature.

    In competing products, a channel or group chat can be made around specific stories or defects, and said channel will only live as long as the story does. This makes for an "ideal" experience as multiple people can join, discuss, and contribute on very targeted topics confidently and archiving when complete.

    permanent channels discurages this behavior, and instead starts to lend it self to generalized "topics" which quickly become 100+ member messes that people stop following.

    Justin King supported this idea  · 
  14. 10,221 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1871 comments  ·  Public » Linux  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King supported this idea  · 
  15. 118 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King supported this idea  · 
  16. 98 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Justin King shared this idea  · 
  17. 103 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King supported this idea  · 
  18. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justin King shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base