Julian Knight
My feedback
-
8,353 votes
Hey guys, thanks for the feedback – we hear you loud and clear. After talking this over with the Engineering team, I confirmed this will remain on the backlog and we are actively considering how to accelerate.
Tweet me if you have any questions! @skprufo
Suphatra
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
1,427 votes
This item is still under review. I’ll keep following up with the feature team and sharing all your feedback.
-Warren
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
47 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
70 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
38 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
172 votes
Warren
responded
Thank you all very much for the great response. The survey is now closed. The feature team will be reviewing all the data that was gathered and responded based on the findings.
Again, thank you for helping us make Microsoft Teams the best it can be.
-WarrenJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
249 votes
This feature is still in the works. There was some adjustments to the overall strategy.
I’ll try to get some additional details and share them with you.-Warren
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
Julian Knight
commented
Absolutely agree with the comments here. Please also see my feedback - https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/17380159-improve-install-options-install-for-all-users-an
Not using UWP for installing Microsoft apps is insane. The current install causes no end of problems and is probably impossible for many enterprise users.
-
101 votes
This request is still under review by the feature team. No additional details are available. I will keep asking and hope to have more details soon.
-Warren
Julian Knight
commented
No, the connector isn't enough at all. It is one way and not a proper integration. Bad enough that we have 3 different chat options (4 if you include consumer Skype, 5 if you include SharePoint discussions) but having no option to integrate them in the "new" interface that is being pushed so hard is unacceptable.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
297 votes
This item is still in the queue. I’m still awaiting more feedback and hope to have more details to share soon.
-Warren
Julian Knight
commented
The SharePoint sync via the "new" ODfB client seems as flaky as the old client. Caused us lots of problems with a Groups site including significant data loss. It got so bad that we had to stop using the Group site altogether and switched instead to a standard SharePoint site which seems to have fewer problems though sync is still unreliable except for ODfB itself.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
904 votes
This is still in the works. I don’t have a timeline yet, but I hope to have some more details to share in the coming weeks.
I know how important this and am working on getting more feedback for you.
-Warren
Julian Knight
commented
Personally I am against this. Much better to make your sites https, better security all round. This absolutely applies to "internal" not just external sites.
-
1,790 votes
As part of our commitment to being customer driven, we’d love your input on top features that will improve your satisfaction with teams and channels navigation, and help you be more productive in Teams. Please access the survey here: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=v4j5cvGGr0GRqy180BHbR7hW7rKdVrVInUSM809cvrtUNFhLRVNJVVhaUFI0WEJHVTA4MlpGWVZUSS4u
Thanks for your feedback!
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
713 votes88 comments · Public » Apps, Connectors, Messaging Extensions · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
The team is still reviewing this item. I hope to know of a decision soon.
-Warren
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
955 votes
We are working on a better experience in Teams when a user is not connected to the internet. No timeline to share at this point, but we will keep you posted.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
638 votes
Hi everyone, the engineer working on this item has left the company and we’re working on replacing him. I wanted to give you that heads up because the work has paused, which extends our shipping date.
I really appreciate your patience as we work to get this back to actively worked on.
Suphatra
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
417 votes
Hey everyone — Suphatra’s back! And I’m on the case with this item.
I talked to engineering and I think they don’t understand this request. The requests says “Admin App” — do you mean Admin Center? The O365 portal?
Also, what exactly do you envision for central administration — for example — what can you do now, can’t do, and would like to do with this new feature.
Your feedback will help me get the team to put more resources into this. Thank you!
Suphatra
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
227 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
300 votes
Hi everyone — we have implemented this on the web version.
We will not be implementing it in the desktop app or mobile app due to other high priority engineering items.
Let me know if you have any questions!
Suphatra
Twitter: @skprufoJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
2,257 votes
Integration with Skype Consumer is no longer under review, and officially planned.
Julian Knight
commented
This would be good. BUT it needs some careful implementation. It would be disasterous if Skype were integrated without the ability for central admin control over who can allow Skype integration.
For the majority of our groups, we would not currently be able to allow Skype integration due to information governance issues. So we would need to have the ability to turn it off for a default setting and for admins only to be able to turn it on for specific teams.
Otherwise, we would not be able to use Teams at all.
Please also add your vote here which already has higher support - same or related feature: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16911079-support-for-private-channels