Julian Knight
My feedback
-
3,925 votes
This feature is still in the planning stage. No new updates are available at this time.
-Warren
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
9,901 votes
We acknowledge the demand for this capability and are exploring the best possible solutions to enable this.
~Alex
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
6,825 votes
Performance has been and continues to be a big focus area for Teams. One main area we have made improvements in is responsiveness for the most frequent user actions of switching between Chat, Channel, and Activity. We are also focused on reducing resource consumption and application load time. More improvements are on the way.
~Alex
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
6,392 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
11,705 votes
We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.
Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.
~Alex
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
9,433 votes
We know many of you are waiting for a Teams client for Linux, and we’re pleased to confirm we’re actively working on it. Stay tuned for more information.
~Alex
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
54 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
1,635 votes
This item is still under review. I’ll keep following up with the feature team and sharing all your feedback.
-Warren
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
50 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
87 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
175 votes
Warren
responded
Thank you all very much for the great response. The survey is now closed. The feature team will be reviewing all the data that was gathered and responded based on the findings.
Again, thank you for helping us make Microsoft Teams the best it can be.
-WarrenJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
Julian Knight
commented
Please also add your vote here which already has higher support - same or related feature: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16911079-support-for-private-channels
-
258 votes
This feature is still in the works. There was some adjustments to the overall strategy.
I’ll try to get some additional details and share them with you.-Warren
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
Julian Knight
commented
Absolutely agree with the comments here. Please also see my feedback - https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/17380159-improve-install-options-install-for-all-users-an
Not using UWP for installing Microsoft apps is insane. The current install causes no end of problems and is probably impossible for many enterprise users.
-
103 votes
This request is still under review by the feature team. No additional details are available. I will keep asking and hope to have more details soon.
-Warren
Julian Knight
commented
No, the connector isn't enough at all. It is one way and not a proper integration. Bad enough that we have 3 different chat options (4 if you include consumer Skype, 5 if you include SharePoint discussions) but having no option to integrate them in the "new" interface that is being pushed so hard is unacceptable.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
304 votes
This item is still in the queue. I’m still awaiting more feedback and hope to have more details to share soon.
-Warren
Julian Knight
commented
The SharePoint sync via the "new" ODfB client seems as flaky as the old client. Caused us lots of problems with a Groups site including significant data loss. It got so bad that we had to stop using the Group site altogether and switched instead to a standard SharePoint site which seems to have fewer problems though sync is still unreliable except for ODfB itself.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
1,018 votes
This is still in the works. I don’t have a timeline yet, but I hope to have some more details to share in the coming weeks.
I know how important this and am working on getting more feedback for you.
-Warren
Julian Knight
commented
Personally I am against this. Much better to make your sites https, better security all round. This absolutely applies to "internal" not just external sites.
-
2,119 votes
As part of our commitment to being customer driven, we’d love your input on top features that will improve your satisfaction with teams and channels navigation, and help you be more productive in Teams. Please access the survey here: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=v4j5cvGGr0GRqy180BHbR7hW7rKdVrVInUSM809cvrtUNFhLRVNJVVhaUFI0WEJHVTA4MlpGWVZUSS4u
Thanks for your feedback!
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
809 votes93 comments · Public » Apps, Connectors, Messaging Extensions · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
The team is still reviewing this item. I hope to know of a decision soon.
-Warren
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
1,130 votes
We are working on a better experience in Teams when a user is not connected to the internet. No timeline to share at this point, but we will keep you posted.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
I now have access to Teams channels on four different tenants.
Switching between them is slow and clunky. It would be far better if it were possible to be active on multiple tenants simultaneously. Switching between tenants as easily as switching channels & getting live updates from all.