Julian Knight
My feedback
-
18,512 votes
Thank you for your votes and comments on this feature. The team is in the process of finalizing designs for deleting private chat threads. I will update as we have more progress to share.
An error occurred while saving the comment Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
57 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
206 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
19,631 votes
Thank you for your continued feedback. We are in the process of testing the downloading of the attendance report after the meeting has concluded. For status updates, please view the roadmap item here, https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/roadmap?filters=Microsoft%20Teams&searchterms=66459.
Download of the meeting attendance list during a meeting is released for general availability. Please note this feature is turned off by default, and needs to be enabled via admin policy. To learn more, please visit our support page at https://support.office.com/article/download-attendance-reports-in-teams-ae7cf170-530c-47d3-84c1-3aedac74d310.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
137 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
118 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
35 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
1,239 votes
The team is looking into this feature and considering solutions. We will update when there is more information to share.
An error occurred while saving the comment Julian Knight
commented
Agree with the other comments that the approach taken by the MSI "installer" is appalling.
Teams is NOT a consumer too but an enterprise one - Microsoft, you need to behave like you understand what an enterprise tool is.
Installing to appdata creates massive bloat in roaming profiles and may be unworkable for people in locked down enterprise environments. Or indeed in locked down environments in general.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
463 votes
Thank you for your feedback! This is our on backlog, we will share an update as soon as one is available.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
44 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
77 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
197 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes0 comments · Public » Apps, Connectors, Messaging Extensions · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesJulian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
4,479 votes
Due to a priority shift this request has slipped to the backlog. I hate to bring bad news. I will continue to provide the feature team your feedback and votes.
Hopefully this will move back up in the queue soon.-Warren
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
-
6,649 votes
This feature is on the backlog. I will update you when we have more details to share.
Julian Knight
supported this idea
·
The excuses given about eDiscovery and unspecified "legal" reasons are specious in the extreme.
eDiscovery would be covered by the use of the standard "trash" facilities - putting the data into a hidden bin for a set amount of time. It would also be covered by the fact that you would only be deleting YOUR COPY of a conversation, it would be up to the other person to also delete their copy if you wanted it totally gone. This is absolutely standard.
Legal hold would cover all remaining legal requirements I would think.
What is more ridiculous is that you CAN delete INDIVIDUAL items in your own side of a conversation, but you cannot delete your copy of someone else's side of the conversation, nor can you delete a range of items.
What also isn't mentioned is data retention. Forcing data to be retained when it is no longer required or is no longer accurate is also against the law in many regions.