Hi everyone -- I'm splitting this feature out from the "Guest Access" feature request so that you can weigh in on this specific issue and provide feedback for it here. Please write in the comments what you would like to see with Federation and I will incorporate it into this description. -Suphatra
#1 -- When our team have a live call meeting we can not add people to the call that doesn't belong to the team, even if they are from the same company. Additionally can we brought client which will be federated.
#2 -- Need to be able to P2P chat/call/screen share with federated partners and other Office 365 tenants that are trusted by default. Need to be able to add all of these same people into meetings.
We are still working on this. Good news is that this is part of the public S4B roadmap for the first quarter of 2018!
Roadmap can be found at: https://skypeandteams.blob.core.windows.net/artefacts/Skype%20for%20Business%20to%20Teams%20Capabilities%20Roadmap.pdf
I’ll keep you all posted as more info becomes available.
David McKnight commented
I need federation with government clients. They see us using Teams, and can't understand why we can't collaborate with it. It's on the roadmap for GCC -- the sooner the better! Thx.
Angie Fletcher commented
This is definitely big for us. We tried to add those who are not sitting in our tenant (on-prem environment using QCS to share free/busy and GAL) as well as, a separate tenant (same company too) using QCS too to federate. This federation we have has not allowed us to add these users as guest, even though they are part of our company.
Any update on this one?
Casper Frank-Stender commented
My primary usage for SfB is the open federation with various other companies. Teams can never be a replacement for SfB if it does not offer this functionality.
Akira Ueda commented
Subsidally compaies also use Teams but they always have to switch between tenants. It is a MUST to have Federation like other Office365 applications.
Henry Pei commented
We shouldn't need to switch tenant back and forth - all teams should come under one roof!
Christian Gustafson commented
Personally, it would be a great advantage to see all my teams and channels in a single view and not to "switch tenant" back and forth all day, but pulling the teams and chats from other tenants to my primary Teams view.
christian hasselbalch commented
without this we cannot really proceed with teams
JW Walton commented
Federation is a must to move away from SfB!
Paul McConnell commented
Any tool that doesn't allow you to add team members that are not part of your organization is doomed.
This must be version 2.0. Maybe by 3.0 we'll have that necessary functionality.
Can one have a call with a person who is or is not on a team? I can see how one can have a call from the team site, but not in Chat.
Dave Girardin commented
Need Federation to be able to limit what domains Guest can be invited from. Having this open to ANY guest is just crazy with no DLP in place at the same time. We want to be able to limit what domains can be allowed as guests.
We need DLP functionality once Federation is a "thing". Not being able to control the content send with Guests makes this something we had to disable.
Aaron Marks commented
We need the federation portion to be seamless for meetings with the flexibility of SfB. Anyone needs to be able to be added.
It's unbelievable that Federation wasn't part of this. It's been a part of Lync/SFB since pretty much day one. Honestly, whoever designed this product should be looking for a new job. If you intend to replace S4B with Teams it must do 100% of what S4B does plus the new features. It'd be like Ford designing a new car and forgetting to include tires.
Peter Braun commented
Has been mentioned a few times already, but as there is no like button on comments, here again... it would be great, if at some stage, we could use Teams to interact with non-Office365 tenant users. Being able to share something, chat, screenshare, voice or video call with someone who gets invited via their MS/Skype, Google or Facebook account via web based Teams client would be great. On top, interacting with a Skype client user would take Teams to a whole new powerful level.
currently if having a chat with federated user, this information is not showing on my own Teams window. it is challenging to have to go back and forth between tenants to view the threads/chats.
Brad Friedlander commented
We need to be able to add an external person (e.g., a customer) using their real (own domain) email address to specific channels within a Team. This type of guess has no visibility or permissions without explicitly adding them (as opposed to Team members who have the same access to all channels).
Mark Jones commented
Federation with customers would be amazing. The ability to set policies as to who can share with who would be even better
Richard Lynn commented
You realize that the answer to your problems is $4 per month, right? FOUR DOLLARS.
You are seriously too cheap to spend 4 dollars to keep your team chatting?... And that's somehow MS's problem? *eyeroll*
Marco Janssen commented
Really missing the ability to add non-Office365/Microsoft accounts as guests