Merge threads from within a channel
We need to ability to merge threads that become disjoint back into a single thread. This includes similar threads that are separated by some gap in time as well as merge separate threads that get started on common topics.
Doug Farley
shared this idea
17 comments
-
Fabe56
commented
Looks like dev doesn't want to implement this must have features... https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16930585-drag-chat-messages-to-merge-them-into-one-reply-th
-
Ryoji Nakase
commented
多くの人がコメントしている通り、スレッドを統一化する機能や、アーカイブ化する機能については検討をお願いしたい。
-
小野
commented
複数のスレッドを一つにまとめる機能をお願いします。
チャネルが限りなく増えていくのが困る -
Anonymous
commented
VOTE! This feature would be absolutely useful when managing a Team with various levels of technical skill and ensuring smooth collaboration between users. This permissions should be for Team Owners only.
-
Anonymous
commented
vote
-
kaja
commented
vote
-
Alex Assis
commented
Absolutely, I used to work with a similar tool call Flowdock by Rally Software (later CA Technologies, no Broadcom) and that was one of the frequent requests that they ended up developing... a major hit with end-users.
MS Teams would benefit a lot from this feature as well...
Very often people don't realize there is a difference between REPLY and START NEW CONVERSATION ... therefore we should be able to merge threads when folks "derail" the conversation....
Please???? :) -
Ariel Daniel
commented
I completely agree this feature is required, and I would like to point out that the issue has been raised, and rejected in the past. When evaluating how much this feature is wanted, it would be appropriate to check the upvotes from past threads as well.
-
Anonymous
commented
This is absolutely needed. Users keep starting new conversations instead of replying.
There must be a way to merge. Even old forum boards had this feature out of the box back in the days. -
Brian
commented
Just wanted to add my two cents worth. It is so easy to start a new thread instead of responding to the one you meant to respond to. The ability to MERGE is an absolute necessity OR rework the UI so that starting a new thread is is just a bit more cumbersome so that users realize BEFORE they post that they are starting a new thread.
-
Peter
commented
Lack of this feature keeps me using Slack.
It comes to be impossible to keep the channel clean with larger and more active groups. -
Chad Smith
commented
This needs to happen. It's one of the biggest flaws in the UI.
The fact that so many users start new threads rather than reply to existing ones shows that the UI is not good enough. -
Brian Kneebone
commented
100% this! As someone who is just trying to get to use teams efficiently, people ***** up replies and forget to reply in-thread. It's a losing game. This would be huge.
-
Jimmy Stokes
commented
Especially needed for complex research and application concepts. What is new is old and old is new in research and a way to keep concepts combined would be extremely helpful.
Can a small suggestion list (~ 3 previous threads)populate to show a user this topic has come up before? This may encourage users to those threads before blasting the post with questions and clutter. It also would connect users to those who know the topic and ultimately drive collaboration. Users seem less likely to search all the way at the top and then roll all the way to the bottom to post their questions/content. Bring the top three similar searches to the post reply.
-
Tim
commented
At the minimum make it so that there's a confirmation before starting a new conversation. That shouldn't be difficult.
-
Philip
commented
I think this is a great idea, as new users to teams usually do not see the difference between a new thread and a reply. This would make the channels way more clean and organized.
There are two other ideas in User Voice for this, too:
https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/599053-schools-and-universities/suggestions/33476689-merging-conversations-in-teams
https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/37215940-can-you-add-a-way-to-merge-group-together-conversa -
Anonymous
commented
I second this, absolutely makes sense from an admin POV and it is necessary to keep "digital hygiene" standards high.