My team has some users on Linux, and one benefit Slack has is a Linux client. Without a Linux client on Microsoft Teams, some orgs may have to turn away in favor of Slack so everyone can participate without keeping a browser open all the time.
We’re pleased to confirm the Teams client for Linux will be available in preview by the end of this calendar year, enabling people who use Linux client at work or in educational institutions to collaborate with others on Teams. Users will be able to install native Linux packages in .deb and .rpm formats.
Tobias Weisserth commented
checking in on this again. Any update on a native Linux client?
If Teams is meant to target the developer community currently using Slack, then we need a Linux client for Teams. I can't stress this enough.
With more and more features being added to Teams as it only exists on Windows, Mac and mobile, I worry about the technical debt starting a Linux port from scratch when all design and implementation decisions so far did not have a Linux environment in mind.
I'll check in frequently to see if there's an update.
Most of the start ups uses Linux as the primary OS. So Linux client is so important which will gain major share of Startups towards Teams.
Slack is an excellent communication tool but lags with the limitation of 10000 messages.
You people are overly touchy. While Linux is nice thing, it brings not a lot for the low number of users and even less of which actually pay for office subscription. I rather see productivity features coming first and once all the major things are covered, the time and money could be invested into a linux port, which shouldn't be too hard since its based on Electron same as Visual Studio Code
Another +1 for this. We use Teams across staff in 4 countries and it works well. I've run Linux for a long time so am used to workarounds but wouldn't it be nice for once to get a native client.
I currently use https://github.com/ivelkov/teams-for-linux which works pretty well.
Shouldn't be a backlog item if you want this product to be taken seriously. Push it and as a mandate, you should not release any product unless it covers the three platforms. Your Software would be truly agnostic then when it comes to platform support. We will go slack if we don't have the complete support across all three primary O/S
I have a large team of people (150 now, 3000 by the end of next year) on Slack b/c it supports Linux and our developers develop on Linux. MS needs to realize that the people who grew up in the hay days of the open source 'revolution' and lived through the 'Halloween documents,' 'Linux is communist, etc.' are now Directors and VP's at large and established companies. We make decisions based on technology platform support. Particularly because Linux has largely won the technology wars.
Christian Ohlendorff Knudsen commented
There's a sort-of workaround in this Electron-powered web wrapper: https://github.com/ivelkov/teams-for-linux
Doug Tucker commented
Would love a notification if this becomes available. I'm stuck on skype until screen share/voice is available either through the web version or a native linux client.
Alfred Feldmeyer commented
!!! ATTENTION !!!
Since March its seems to be in development. But the Link provided by Suphatra seems to be broken: https://1drv.ms/xs/s!AryUNzh1ogZzif8pDcOcx2pW45I87w. We have a bunch of developers here eager to test it.
Dear admins: Let us help you :)
!!! ATTENTION !!!
Come on MS! Give us a client for linux!
[Deleted User] commented
Our team has now moved to Slack because of this. It is ridiculous when a Linux environment is needed for some development.
Micael Paquier commented
I can't understand how this feature can be in the top-8 on UserVoice and still in the backlog... This has been the case for months / years, it's a pitty. Our team will probably roll back to Slack, until there is a supported linux client...
the company I work for chose teams as im / video / audio tool for remote users. I do not run windows at home and therefore stuck with the teams web page.
if you can provide the functionality to call / video via the web page that would be a half way solution.
native client is preferred. I do not see why it is so difficult as team is based on skype and there is a native skype client for linux.
any news please?
Hi Joey ! Funny Thing is everybody on my development Team uses Linux, i dont think it should be that suprising for you. Sadly some of our partners uses Teams, and we have to use it as well.
But if the integration doesnt allow Screensharing and Videoconference its kinda bad.
Joey Bowles commented
Shocked to see this many people voting for a Linux client. Do you actually use Linux in your daily desktop work or are you voting on some type of lofty notion that an app should be available across all platforms? That's a serious question even if it sounds snarky. I see many companies with Linux servers, but it's very rare that I see someone in business using it as their daily desktop driver.
Almost half of our development team is using Linux and we would like to use Teams, but it's quite difficult without a native client
Slack isn't an enterprise application.
Michael Rusch commented
Our institute has made a strong investment in MS products in general, but in this area, we've bought Slack because so many of our developers use Linux. As an IT director, I'm always looking to reduce the number of tools we use, so I'd love to eliminate Slack, but I can't even suggest it until there's a Linux client for MS Teams.
Sinuee Hernandez commented
In my company too