How can we make Microsoft Teams better?

Support for Private Channels

Looking for the ability to create a channel that only channel members can see. Private channels are available in slack. There is an admin for private channels who is the creator, and they are the ones who add/remove users.

Five types of public/privacy that is being asked for by users:

- Public-Open (visible anywhere including outside the org and anyone can join)
- Public-Invitation (visible anywhere including outside the org, must be invited)
- Company-Open (only visible inside the org and anyone in the org can join; outside the org must be invited)
- Company-Invitation (only visible inside the org, must be invited)
- Secret (invisible to everyone except existing members, must be invited)

21,328 votes
Sign in
Sign in with: facebook google
Signed in as (Sign out)

We’ll send you updates on this idea

Angela Sze shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →


Sign in
Sign in with: facebook google
Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Kerry M commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Private channels woot woot!!! Please help us minimize O365 group objects! this is critical to any organization or business! People can become overwhelmed with the amount of Teams they are on because we are not able to be more granular with Team Channels. Similar to file shares, everyone may need access to the majority of content except for a few restricted folders only a subset of folks should have.

  • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    A private channel will also need private files for our company to implement Teams. Please elaborate on how file permissions will work in a private channel.

    Thank you for working on the request for the private channels!

  • Salah Ahmed commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Just look at how slack has done it and assess if that's a good baseline and get it done. This is a 1-3 months effort to be MMP grade at best.

    Any ETA or will we hear in ignite?

  • Darwin commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    We need this so we can have a public team for hosting cross-team escalations. Public Team + Private Channel would allow one team like "ChatOps for Ad-Hoc Escallations" but each escalation would not have to make it's data public.

  • Sathish Kumar commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    This feature is very necessary for a Project/Group/Team which has sub Teams and wants to share information within themselves, which may not be of interest for the entire crowd. Looking forward to have this feature in the MT. Again, it shouldn't be restricted with Owner to say if it can be private/public. The Sub-Team which creates a private channel should be allowed to say who is part / not part of that channel.

  • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    If this idea is implemented, would it be possible to automate the permissions on the related SharePoint folder to allow only the members of the private channel into the folder?

  • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    I agree with this completely. Personally, I'd love to have one team for my entire office, perhaps even the organization, and then create channels to represent sub groups, offices, etc.

  • MNS commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Are you also considering "private tabs" or tabs that can be password protected?
    Onenote has password protected sections...
    (I guess a Onenote section is best compared to a Teams Channel, but still...)

  • Matti Paukkonen commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    How private channel's files are going to be managed? Is private channel just for chats only and files are managed on other channels?
    How about private channel's OneNote section?

  • Mike commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    We had a suggestion today that for inter-departmental communication, it might be nice for departments to have public teams. However, they still need somewhere to store their files that would not be publicly available.

    Would we be able to make a Public Team and then make a Private Channel underneath it? E.g. I could create a team called "Information Technology" and leave it public so other people could interact with the IT team. Could I then make a "Help Desk" channel and make it private to just the Help Desk people? Or would I have to make a Private Team and add the entire organization to it and then make the private channel? That would obviously not be ideal...


  • Joshua Todd Cowper commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    From an Australian high school's perspective (and I'm sure this must be common in other countries too)...

    We have subjects, which is a group of students, generally in the same year level/grade, studying a syllabus/curriculum -- for example "Year 11 Mathematical Methods". This would be our top level "Team" and might contain 90 students.

    This is then broken down into classes. Each class is studying the same subject, but each contains about 30 students (out of the 90), is taught by a different teacher, and meets at different times.

    We need this breakdown and that's where the new "Private Channels" sound promising, for each individual class. It would be important that the Educational features of teams are incorporated here though. For example, an "assignment" might go to the whole team if it is a piece of summative assessment (counts toward student grades) that the whole subject therefore needs to submit. However, an "assignment" might also be a piece of review homework that one teacher has set for their class only, so should therefore go to just their Private Channel.

    The OneNote Class Notebook would also need this understanding of subjects (Teams) and classes (Private Channels). Currently, a channel simply adds one section to the Collaboration Space in the Class Notebook. We would need to have the ability to add multiple sections, to either a Content Library or Collaboration Space, accessible to either the whole Team or just a specific Private Channel.

  • Mike commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    I'd also appreciate any sort of ETA you might have. Weeks? Months? Just so we can plan ahead. We can't fully move to Teams until we have the Private Channels working.

  • Ruth Jennaway commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Any update? I would love to hear the progress and expected timeline on this item now that Guest access to teams has been released this week...

  • Harrison Hudson commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    This should be a no-brainer feature implemented in tandem with guest access. There are obvious circumstances where users may want channels within their team to which Guest Accounts do not have access.

  • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    SOOOO verrry happy that Microsoft is implementing this functionality. It will push my org towards total integration of this app. THANK Microsoft :-)

  • Jake Moore commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Great, this will really help me achieve what I need to! Thanks for sharing the intention

Feedback and Knowledge Base